Hi!
Hartmut Goebel skribis:
> Am 03.01.23 um 10:49 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> I tried something different and perhaps simpler: making sure
>> ‘options->update-specs’ always returns a list of , as the
>> name implies, and does the right thing with manifests, -r, and -e.
>> (Part of the patch
Am 03.01.23 um 10:49 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
I tried something different and perhaps simpler: making sure
‘options->update-specs’ always returns a list of , as the
name implies, and does the right thing with manifests, -r, and -e.
(Part of the patch moves the definition before its first
use.)
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Okay. Here’s something simpler using “partition”:
>
> commit 96fb123832b262a3453fe1b7646758da235a343e
> Author: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Tue Jan 3 10:14:52 2023 +0100
>
> WIP
>
> diff --git a/guix/scripts/refresh.scm b/guix/scripts/refresh.scm
> index
Hi Hartmut,
> Am 02.01.23 um 20:17 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>
> Thanks for providing the patch. For me this looks huge and hard to
> maintain.
>
> “Hard to maintain”? How so?
>
> For me this double structure is hard to understand and thus to maintain. YMMV.
Okay. Here’s something simpler using
Am 02.01.23 um 20:17 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
Thanks for providing the patch. For me this looks huge and hard to
maintain.
“Hard to maintain”? How so?
For me this double structure is hard to understand and thus to maintain.
YMMV.
Anyhow, if you want me to implement a solution bases on your
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> Am 02.01.23 um 14:16 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> Attached is a crude implementation of that. I just consed the lists
>> together instead of returning multiple values, because the compound
>> value is to be used inside the store monad where we can’t
Hello Ricardo,
Am 02.01.23 um 14:16 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
Attached is a crude implementation of that. I just consed the lists
together instead of returning multiple values, because the compound
value is to be used inside the store monad where we can’t easily access
multiple values.
Thanks
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> It’s a bit messy because options->update-specs is poorly typed now. We
> could also have it return a compound value (or a union type) with a list
> of values and a list of values, and process the
> components separately.
Attached is a crude implementation of that.
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> I managed working on this this evening already.
Thank you for taking the time!
> Am 31.12.22 um 15:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> Commit 8aeccc6240ec45f0bc7bed655e0c8149ae4253eb seems like the problem
>> here. Hartmut, can you please fix this? Otherwise I’d like to
Hi Ricardo,
I managed working on this this evening already.
Am 31.12.22 um 15:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
Commit 8aeccc6240ec45f0bc7bed655e0c8149ae4253eb seems like the problem
here. Hartmut, can you please fix this? Otherwise I’d like to revert
this and related commits ASAP.
I fixed he
Hi Ricardo,
my fault, I missed running the tests again after the latest changes.
I'll work on fixing this tomorrow (Monday).
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> I haven’t seen these patches on the mailing list or the issue tracker.
> Have they been reviewed? These changes also break existing tests, which
> should have been run before merging.
>
> Let us please do better and avoid breaking the master branch by
> discussing
Hi Guix,
Running “guix refresh -t cran -u” I get this error:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 18 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
In unknown file:
17 (apply-smob/0 #)
In
13 matches
Mail list logo
