Re: Bugs and Patches---or rather, bugs or patches?

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi,

Josselin Poiret  writes:

> Hi Felix,
>
> Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
> distribution."  writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We track bugs and patches separately.  Does the distinction serve a
>> purpose?  May I combine them?
>
> What do you mean by tracking them separately and combining them?
> They're on two different lists, right?  I don't like the separation
> between both MLs, sure, but that's it.  What would be the pros/cons of
> such a merge?

I like to be able to see a list of just reported bugs, without having to
use any filters.  Combining the trackers would make this impossible/more
difficult.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Re: Bugs and Patches---or rather, bugs or patches?

[Josselin Poiret]

Hi Felix,

Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution."  writes:

> Hi,
>
> We track bugs and patches separately.  Does the distinction serve a
> purpose?  May I combine them?

What do you mean by tracking them separately and combining them?
They're on two different lists, right?  I don't like the separation
between both MLs, sure, but that's it.  What would be the pros/cons of
such a merge?

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bugs and Patches---or rather, bugs or patches?

[Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.]

Hi,

We track bugs and patches separately.  Does the distinction serve a
purpose?  May I combine them?

Thanks!

Kind regards
Felix