On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:01:52 -0400
Mark H Weaver wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > Gammel Holte skribis:
> >
> >> I would like to draw your attention to new Rockchip ARM machines (e.g. Asus
> >> C201). These are very
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:32:28AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think many of us are interested in having GuixSD on those devices.
Absolutely! OpenWRT runs MIPS routers and replacing those
eventually with Guix support would be great.
> Mark recently ported GuixSD to mips, which allowed him
Hello!
Gammel Holte skribis:
> I would like to draw your attention to new Rockchip ARM machines (e.g. Asus
> C201). These are very cheap, easy to reflash and can be run without any
> blobs (except 3D acceleration, unless the Lima driver gets finished). They
> don't even
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015, at 17:51, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> Along these lines, it might be interesting if we can get more of the
>> guix "core" packages in Guix paired down in size. It's unlikely that
>> I'm going to be building packages on a
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think many of us are interested in having GuixSD on those devices.
>
> Mark recently ported GuixSD to mips, which allowed him to identify
> architecture-specific assumptions need to be addressed. That was an
> important
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <
cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> Along these lines, it might be interesting if we can get more of the
> guix "core" packages in Guix paired down in size. It's unlikely that
> I'm going to be building packages on a neo900 or etc, but I
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Gammel Holte skribis:
>
>> I would like to draw your attention to new Rockchip ARM machines (e.g. Asus
>> C201). These are very cheap, easy to reflash and can be run without any
>> blobs (except 3D acceleration, unless
Great!
I have one thinkpad x60 and x200t with GuixSD, in soon I'll try use
libreboot.
--
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1 3:)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015, at 17:51, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Along these lines, it might be interesting if we can get more of the
> guix "core" packages in Guix paired down in size. It's unlikely that
> I'm going to be building packages on a neo900 or etc, but I might want
> all my small
Hello everyone,
as a user, I've joined Guix due to technical reasons (functional package
management in Scheme) and focus on freedom (linux-libre kernel, etc). I
guess many people here share these values.
Freedom ultimately depends on the underlying hardware too. My goal is to do
all my computing
Gammel Holte writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> as a user, I've joined Guix due to technical reasons (functional package
> management in Scheme) and focus on freedom (linux-libre kernel, etc). I
> guess many people here share these values.
>
> Freedom ultimately depends on the underlying hardware too.
11 matches
Mail list logo