On Dec 23, 2023, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> the fact remains that
> you want to contribute some work to a project under a different
> license.
> Publishing some source code under the GPL v3
> (or later) does not preclude you as the sole author from also
> publishing it under the CC-0.
...
Am Mittwoch, dem 03.01.2024 um 22:22 +0100 schrieb Wojtek Kosior:
> > > I don't know whether you are a consequentialist but I surely am
> > > not.
> > > I am trying to apply the principle of double effect in my
> > > reasoning. If I am to be criticized for making morally wrong
> > > choices, let
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, at 3:32 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-01-03, Wojtek Kosior via wrote:
>> Before getting back to the discussion, please let me ask 1 question.
>> Assume I submit a patch series that adds some useful and needed code and
>> includes a copyright notice with a promise,
> > I don't know whether you are a consequentialist but I surely am not.
> > I am trying to apply the principle of double effect in my reasoning.
> > If I am to be criticized for making morally wrong choices, let the
> > criticism at least concern incorrect application of that principle.
>
Hello Alexandre and thank your for your response!
> When facing a situation of abuse, of violence, it may be morally
> defensible for someone to turn a blind eye and allow it to proceed.
> It's questionable, but unlike the abuse itself, it's not uniformly
> reproachable.
>
> But it's also
On 2024-01-03, Wojtek Kosior via wrote:
> Before getting back to the discussion, please let me ask 1 question.
> Assume I submit a patch series that adds some useful and needed code and
> includes a copyright notice with a promise, like this
>
> ;;; Copyright © 2023 Wojtek Kosior
> ;;; Wojtek
Am Mittwoch, dem 03.01.2024 um 18:46 +0100 schrieb Wojtek Kosior:
> Before getting back to the discussion, please let me ask 1 question.
> Assume I submit a patch series that adds some useful and needed code
> and includes a copyright notice with a promise, like this
>
> ;;; Copyright © 2023
Hello, Kosior,
Happy GNU year to all
https://www.fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/2023-12-31-happy-gnu-year
On Dec 27, 2023, Wojtek Kosior via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." wrote:
> These legal means can be considered brutal. Even if I did something
> bad to someone (which
Before getting back to the discussion, please let me ask 1 question.
Assume I submit a patch series that adds some useful and needed code and
includes a copyright notice with a promise, like this
;;; Copyright © 2023 Wojtek Kosior
;;; Wojtek Kosior promises not to sue for violations of this
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, dem 27.12.2023 um 10:22 +0100 schrieb Wojtek Kosior:
> Hi
>
> > > Now, should such marginalization be repeated even within the
> > > freesw circles? If it is harmful to block ppl from participating
> > > in the society using libre software (as universities, tax
> > > offices,
Hi there
> It's worth noting that CC0 is not a license but a public domain
> dedication. One cannot dual-license it with GPL because copyright
> no longer applies to the work: https://creativecommons.org/faq
Actually, in some countries' laws there is no notion of public domain
and it is not
Hi
> > Now, should such marginalization be repeated even within the freesw
> > circles? If it is harmful to block ppl from participating in the
> > society using libre software (as universities, tax offices, etc. are
> > doing) — and one disapproves it — then one will make efforts to avoid
> >
On 2023-12-24 at 03:41+01:00, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Publishing some source code under the GPL v3 (or later)
> does not preclude [someone] as the sole author
> from also publishing it under the CC-0. It does
> defeat the purpose of the GPL if you, however,
> because whoever wants to make
Am Samstag, dem 23.12.2023 um 19:19 +0100 schrieb Wojtek Kosior via
Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.:
> > I would offer a chronological list of my downloadable contributions
> > to Guix and place the following wording on top of the page:
> >
> > "I disagree with the
> I would offer a chronological list of my downloadable contributions to
> Guix and place the following wording on top of the page:
>
> "I disagree with the licensing model embraced by GNU Guix and hereby
> release my contributions there under the CC-0 license. For convenience,
> you can also use
Hi Wojtek,
On Fri, Dec 22 2023, Wojtek Kosior wrote:
> I'm not sure how an "appropriate note" would look like. Where do you
> imagine it?
I would offer a chronological list of my downloadable contributions to
Guix and place the following wording on top of the page:
"I disagree with the
Thanks for the response
> Could you publish your diffs elsewhere with an appropriate note that
> they are also available under CC-0 from there?
Well, that's more or less what I am already doing with a public git
repo for my fork — except I'm not sure how an "appropriate note" would
look like.
Hi Wojtek,
On Fri, Dec 22 2023, Wojtek Kosior via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
System distribution." wrote:
> I'd like the lines of code I authored to be dual-licensed under
> GPL-3.0-or-later and CC0-1.0. This is purely for personal reasons (as
> having a mere few dozens of lines in a
Hi
I have some changes in my personal Guix fork that I'd like to
contribute. I'd like the lines of code I authored to be dual-licensed
under GPL-3.0-or-later and CC0-1.0. This is purely for personal
reasons (as having a mere few dozens of lines in a project under CC0
causes no practical change
19 matches
Mail list logo
