Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-07-08 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Dimakakos Dimos writes: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> I've (finally) pushed racket-minimal. >> Hooray! >> >> Now to the Racket importer... Anyone? >> Dimakakos? :) > > Nice! It will be very useful. I've put some research into a build system > for racket, and sadly it isn't trivial to match the

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-20 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > At first glance, I don't think the builder would be too hard. > > On a related note, installing racket-minimal, then running > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > raco pkg install drracket >

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-20 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
At first glance, I don't think the builder would be too hard. On a related note, installing racket-minimal, then running --8<---cut here---start->8--- raco pkg install drracket --8<---cut here---end--->8--- works except for

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-20 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:55:45PM -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > Am I right then that the challenge is less an "importer" from the Racket > package repository and more to do with how Racket actually installs its > package outputs? Or is it both? At this stage a simple importer and

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-19 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Dimakakos Dimos writes: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> I've (finally) pushed racket-minimal. >> Hooray! >> >> Now to the Racket importer... Anyone? >> Dimakakos? :) > > Nice! It will be very useful. I've put some research into a build system > for racket, and sadly it isn't trivial to match the

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2020-02-19 Thread Dimakakos Dimos
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > I've (finally) pushed racket-minimal. > Hooray! > > Now to the Racket importer... Anyone? > Dimakakos? :) Nice! It will be very useful. I've put some research into a build system for racket, and sadly it isn't trivial to match the racket package system to guix.

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Dimakakos Dimos skribis: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> I think nobody has written a Racket importer. I have it as a >> longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the >> time... despite the fact that I desperately want the feature. > > I could start working on

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-05 Thread Dimakakos Dimos
Thanks for all the motivation everyone, I've started working on it so I'll start thread later or tomorrow with the progress I've done and any questions that occur to me.

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-05 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Gábor Boskovits writes: > Hello, > > Dimakakos Dimos ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 5., > Szo 0:57): > >> >> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: >> >> > I think nobody has written a Racket importer. I have it as a >> > longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the >> > time...

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-05 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, Dimakakos Dimos ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 5., Szo 0:57): > > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > > > I think nobody has written a Racket importer. I have it as a > > longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the > > time... despite the fact that I desperately want

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-04 Thread Dimakakos Dimos
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > I think nobody has written a Racket importer. I have it as a > longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the > time... despite the fact that I desperately want the feature. I could start working on this, starting tomorrow. I will need a

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:23:18PM -0400, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > I think nobody has written a Racket importer. I have it as a > longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the > time... despite the fact that I desperately want the feature. > > I'm just desperate for a

Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-04 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
I think nobody has written a Racket importer. I have it as a longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the time... despite the fact that I desperately want the feature. I'm just desperate for a lot of things right now! ;) - Chris Pjotr Prins writes: > What is the status of

Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
What is the status of creating Racket packages. For a REST API server I have two dependencies: : raco pkg install https://github.com/dmac/spin.git : raco pkg install https://github.com/BourgondAries/memo.git what is the recommended way of packaging them in GNU Guix? Pj. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at