Kinda late to the party here but I think a goal for 1.0 should be to ensure
every single package builds on x86_64 and/or i686 and that most substitutes
are available at the time of release.
Having guix claim to have packages which then fail to build can leave a poor
first impression. It's
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’ve pushed to guix/maintenance.git a list of things that IMO we should
> do or might want to do for 1.0, with the understanding that 1.0 should
> happen in 2018 (or early 2019 at the latest!). :-)
>
>
Pjotr Prins transcribed 466 bytes:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:36:35AM +, rchar01 wrote:
> > As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name.
> >
> > - https://www.pureos.net/
> > - from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html
>
> We should have some flavours:
>
> FunGuixOs
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:36:35AM +, rchar01 wrote:
> As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name.
>
> - https://www.pureos.net/
> - from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html
We should have some flavours:
FunGuixOs
SeriousGuixOs
VerySeriousGuixOS
As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name.
- https://www.pureos.net/
- from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 31, 2018 5:54 PM, Amirouche Boubekki
wrote:
> > > > If we want an
> > > >
> > >If we want an
> > improved label for the Guix system distribution, the best one is
> > probably "GuixOS" since "OS" is a widely used and recognized
> > abbreviation ...
>
> Is exactly my opinion also, so it gets a +1
>
Top 3:
1) GuixOS
2) Guix
3) Guix System
Hello,
I was refraining to answer, but this:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:29 PM George Clemmer wrote:
> I think this discussion was primarily triggered by the realization that
> we can improve the top-level presentation of Guix by downplaying the
> distinction between Guix and GuixSD. In fact, we
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> George Clemmer ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 30., Cs,
> 21:14):
>
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>> > Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I think “Guix System” is OK.
>> >
>> > I think so too.
>>
>> I recommend against renaming GuixSD >> "Guix
George Clemmer ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 30., Cs,
21:14):
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I think “Guix System” is OK.
> >
> > I think so too.
>
> I recommend against renaming GuixSD >> "Guix System". Here is Why:
>
> 1) A noob would
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> - The name "Guix CI" tells developers what it is (continuous integration)
> while
> "Cuirass" does not. This is mostly true, however, for almost all
> applications
> (mpv, firefox, chromium, emacs, ).
Just an anecdote: I didn't know what Cuirass was until I
Hi Chris,
> I'm not advocating that we change anything; I'm only advocating that we
> should make our stability promise (if any) clear by documenting it. If
> you want to know my thoughts about what sort of stability promise we
> should provide, I'd be happy to talk about that also, but here
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think “Guix System” is OK.
>
> I think so too.
I recommend against renaming GuixSD >> "Guix System". Here is Why:
1) A noob would expect "guix system" to refer to the whole Guix
enchilada. If we use it to refer to GuixSD,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I think “Guix System” is OK. Most of the time we’ll just say “Guix”, as
> is already the case, and when we need to disambiguate (for instance when
> addressing bugs), we’ll ask “Are you using Guix System?” or “Are you
> using the Guix distro?”, and everything will be
Am 30.08.2018 um 14:04 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> “Guix Continuous”
For me this sounds like a fail-save system which will continue running,
and running, and running.
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com |
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
>
>> - If we get started with Guix CI and Guix OS, I'm afraid that soon enough we
>> will end up with a bunch Guix FS, Guix IP, Guix CD...
>
> I think “Guix System” is OK. Most of the time we’ll just say “Guix”, as
> is
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice transcribed 340 bytes:
> Guix,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Ludovic Courtès writes:
> > > I think “Guix System” is OK.
> >
> > I think so too.
>
> Big +1.
>
> If you use 'guix system', you're using Guix System[0].
>
> It doesn't get less confusing than that.
>
> Kind
Guix,
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ludovic Courtès writes:
I think “Guix System” is OK.
I think so too.
Big +1.
If you use 'guix system', you're using Guix System[0].
It doesn't get less confusing than that.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]: The only question left is 'on what?'. Everything, of
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
>
>> Conversely, "Guix CI" is much less widespread, although I suppose many
>> developers are familiar with the term. I personally prefer unique, easy
>> names
>> to abbreviations.
>>
>> - The name "Guix CI" tells developers
Hello,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Conversely, "Guix CI" is much less widespread, although I suppose many
> developers are familiar with the term. I personally prefer unique, easy names
> to abbreviations.
>
> - The name "Guix CI" tells developers what it is (continuous integration)
> while
>
> >> ** TODO “GuixSD” renamed to “Guix System”?
>
> Guix System is not good because "system" is a word that is too generic.
>
> What about "Guix OS"?
>
> >> ** TODO “Cuirass” renamed to “Guix CI”?
>
> OK
On the one hand, OS and CI are rather ubiquitous.
On the other hand, I've personally always
"There are only two hard problems in Computer Science: cache
invalidation and naming things"
On 2018-07-30 03:23, Pjotr Prins wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 05:18:21PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
#+TITLE: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, 2018
* miscellaneous
** TODO “GuixSD” rename
Le lun. 20 août 2018 à 09:45, Ricardo Wurmus a écrit :
>
> Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>
> >> I’ve pushed to guix/maintenance.git a list of things that IMO we should
> >> do or might want to do for 1.0, with the understanding that 1.0 should
> >> happen in 2018 (or early 2019 at the latest!).
Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>> I’ve pushed to guix/maintenance.git a list of things that IMO we should
>> do or might want to do for 1.0, with the understanding that 1.0 should
>> happen in 2018 (or early 2019 at the latest!). :-)
>>
>>
Hi Ludo,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Chris Marusich skribis:
>
>> At the moment, I only have this to add: It would be nice if we could
>> decide on how we will use version numbers going forward and publish a
>> description of that in the manual or on the website.
>>
>> I think the
Hello everyone,
On 2018-07-29 17:18, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello Guix!
I’ve pushed to guix/maintenance.git a list of things that IMO we should
do or might want to do for 1.0, with the understanding that 1.0 should
happen in 2018 (or early 2019 at the latest!). :-)
Hello,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> My two cents because I'm not sure it fits the list:
>
> - `man' is broken.
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2018-05/msg00084.html
[...]
> - As Julien mentioned recently, I think we should provide a "stable"
> channel. Is it already
Hi Chris,
Chris Marusich skribis:
> At the moment, I only have this to add: It would be nice if we could
> decide on how we will use version numbers going forward and publish a
> description of that in the manual or on the website.
>
> I think the important thing is that we publish a
Also how far did we go with LVM support?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pjotr Prins transcribed 2.9K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 05:18:21PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > #+TITLE: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, 2018
> > #+STARTUP: hidestars
> >
> > * 'guix pull' & co.
> > ** TODO 'guix pull' honors ~/.config/guix/channels.scm
&g
> Sentimental Versioning
Didn't know about this, interesting take... :)
My two cents because I'm not sure it fits the list:
- `man' is broken.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2018-05/msg00084.html
It seems trivial but I don't think we should put a 1.0 stamp on an OS that
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> #+TITLE: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, 2018
A lot of good stuff! I hope I can find the time to help knock out some
of these things.
At the moment, I only have this to add: It would be nice if we could
decide on how we will use version numbers going forw
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 05:18:21PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> #+TITLE: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, 2018
> #+STARTUP: hidestars
>
> * 'guix pull' & co.
> ** TODO 'guix pull' honors ~/.config/guix/channels.scm
> *** (guix channels) module provides easy way to build a set o
. Committers should feel free to edit the file
directly in maintenance.git, especially to mark things as done. ;-)
Copy of the file attached below.
Ludo’.
PS: I’m starting the discussion but will go AFK soon after sending this
message. :-)
#+TITLE: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, 2018
#+STARTUP
33 matches
Mail list logo
