l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
>> From 59c12882e6954b17750c617abddf4997a9bcbfa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?=
>> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:07:23 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] packages: Mark
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> From 59c12882e6954b17750c617abddf4997a9bcbfa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?=
> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:07:23 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] packages: Mark 'replacement' as an "innate" field.
>
> Suggested by
Hi Alex,
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2017-06-30 11:35 +0200) wrote:
[...]
>>> Looks like this was removed in an attempt to improve performance over
>>> NFS. The “scheme-files” procedure now includes a comment:
>>>
>>> ;; XXX: We don't recurse if we find a
Hi,
if you want, in order to start developing the installer, the easiest way is to
run as NORMAL USER (not root):
$ mkdir guix-installer
$ cd guix-installer
$ git clone -b wip-installer-2 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
$ cd guix
$ ./pre-inst-env guix environment guix --fallback
On Sat 01 Jul 2017 15:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
>> My understanding is that Guile 2.2 traded slower compilation for faster
>> execution of compiled programs. Hopefully the performance of the
>> compiler will be improved in later
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Sat 01 Jul 2017 15:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari skribis:
>>
>>> My understanding is that Guile 2.2 traded slower compilation for faster
>>> execution of compiled programs. Hopefully the performance of
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> First, we could mark the ‘replacement’ field as “innate”, which means it
>> will never be inherited (like the ‘location’ field.) Like you, I can’t
>> think of a situation where inheriting the replacement
ng0 skribis:
> What about the sledgehammer approach:
> Would it help if we just split the incredible long modules into
> smaller modules like python-web, python-library, etc?
We can always do that, yes (and it’s probably a good idea independently
of this.)
Any volunteer
Andy Wingo transcribed 1.5K bytes:
> On Sat 01 Jul 2017 15:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > Leo Famulari skribis:
> >
> >> My understanding is that Guile 2.2 traded slower compilation for faster
> >> execution of compiled programs. Hopefully the performance of
I have just activated an guix caching mirror at
https://guix-mirror.infotropique.org/ which is
open for the public to use.
Just don't start a goldrush on using it, I'm
waiting for the hoster to increase the disk space.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG:
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.3K bytes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
> > What about the sledgehammer approach:
> > Would it help if we just split the incredible long modules into
> > smaller modules like python-web, python-library, etc?
>
> We can always do that, yes (and it’s
Ludovic Courtès (2017-06-30 11:35 +0200) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Christopher Baines writes:
>>
>>> Recently I had problems with the way GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH was working with
>>> govuk-guix [1]. Currently, I'm using a separate directory
12 matches
Mail list logo