Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello guix, I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp. Currently I see two ways forward: 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls.

Estimating build time

2018-10-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: [...] >>> Currently, there’s no way to tell if the derivations listed under “These >>> derivations will be built” are expensive package builds or just simple >>> graft derivations. >> >> Indeed. A simple

Re: Meetup in Paris, Dec. 10th!

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 17:47): > > Hello! > > Konrad Hinsen skribis: > > > Am 11.10.18 um 15:55 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > > >> I’ve booked a room at Inria’s offices in Paris for the Dec. 10 gathering > >> I proposed a while back, see: > > > > Great! At what time

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Björn Höfling
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > Hello guix, > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that > > disables generating the

Re: Meetup in Paris, Dec. 10th!

2018-10-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Konrad Hinsen skribis: > Am 11.10.18 um 15:55 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > >> I’ve booked a room at Inria’s offices in Paris for the Dec. 10 gathering >> I proposed a while back, see: > > Great! At what time does it start? We can aim for 9AM to 6PM. >> A couple of notes: the room

Flagging packages

2018-10-12 Thread Brett Gilio
I was wondering if there has been any discussion on introducing a way to flag out-of-date packages either through the guix package website or using a guix package flag. I, personally, come from an Arch/Parabola background, and such a feature was usually a good way to alert the community of

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 20:01): > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > > > Hello guix, > > > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > > There is

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2018-10-12, Björn Höfling wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: >> Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. >> 12., P, 19:00): >> > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. >> > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that >> >

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 19:00): > > Hello guix, > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables > generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp. > Currently I see two ways

Re: Gradio attempt

2018-10-12 Thread Brett Gilio
Leo Famulari writes: On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 04:33:31PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote: Thank you for your feedback on the description. As for whether or not the application works, yes. I click on "Add stations to library". It takes a few seconds for it to populate, but I am eventually shown

Re: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging?

2018-10-12 Thread Christopher Baines
Christopher Baines writes: > A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be > good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix. > > I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some > fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get > some

Reproducible rust builds

2018-10-12 Thread Nikolai Merinov
Hi, I made some investigations about reproducible builds of rust packages (at least of my laptop with x86_64 arch) and I got next results: 1. I failed to make rust 1.25.0 reproducible with LLVM 6.0.1, but this release reproducible if we build it with LLVM 3.9.1. I also tried to build rust 1.25.0

Re: Estimating build time

2018-10-12 Thread Clément Lassieur
Ludovic Courtès writes: > In a similar vein, the attached module provides code to estimate package > build time based on locally-available build logs. It can be used to > show hints like this: [...] > The obvious downside is that it works by first retrieving the names of > the files under

Re: [outreachy] am I in the right track to contribute

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello Laura, Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 11., Cs, 21:58): > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:05 PM Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > > Hello Laura, > > > > Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. > > okt. 11., Cs, 16:32): > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:24 AM Gábor Boskovits > > >

Re: Outreachy applicant

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello Cecilia, Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 11., Cs, 20:38): > > Hi Cecilia, > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:19:08 -0300 > Cecilia Ortmann wrote: > > > El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 5:31, Gábor Boskovits > > () escribió: > > > > > Hello Cecilia, > > > > > > Could you give us a status

Re: [outreachy] am I in the right track to contribute

2018-10-12 Thread Laura Lazzati
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > Hello Laura, > > Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. > okt. 11., Cs, 21:58): > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:05 PM Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > > > > Hello Laura, > > > > > > Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. > > > okt. 11.,