Re: [bootstrappable] Re: GNU Mes 0.19 released

Arne Babenhauserheide writes: Hi Arne, >> You can see the current bootstrap path here: >> >> https://bootstrappable.org/projects/mes.html > I do not see gmake in there. Is that covered by one of them, or can it > be built with them? `make-mesboot0' is the initial build of GNU make. You

Re: Re-approaching package tagging

Dear, Does the command `guix package -s rogue` fit your needs ? Because `--search` search in synopsis and description. Then `ruby-multi-test` is false-positive, I guess. And `nethack` does not show up. Maybe because the description and/or synopsis is not verbose enough. If `guix package -s rogue

Re: [bootstrappable] Re: GNU Mes 0.19 released

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > `make-mesboot0' is the initial build of GNU make. You can read the full > Guix bootstrap build recipe here: > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/commencement.scm?h=core-updates Ah, nice! Again: Thank you very much! Best wishes,

Re: [SECURITY] Which packages bundle sqlite?

Hi Alex, This issue is being tracked at , so it would be best to send followups regarding this issue to <33...@debbugs.gnu.org>. Alex Vong writes: > I also want to know should we graft in this case since updating sqlite > would cause ~4000s rebuilts. Yes, it should

Re: [bootstrappable] Re: GNU Mes 0.19 released

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Arne, > >> Do you have a document showing the bootstrap path — ideally in graph >> form, i.e. with plantuml activity diagram? >> http://plantuml.com/activity-diagram-legacy > > You can see the current bootstrap path here: > >

Re: Re-approaching package tagging

Hi :) On 2018-12-17 20:01, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: Hello, In the past when we've discussed package tagging, I think Ludo' has been against it, primarily because it's a giant source of bikeshedding. I agree that it's a huge space for bikeshedding... no space provides more bikeshedding

Proposed bootstrap update: mes-minimal-stripped-tarball-0.19

Hi! On my core-updates @gitlab (https://gitlab.com/janneke/guix.git) I have a couple of patches. This patch set has two main features: do not use %bootstrap-guile (no %fake-bootstrap? any more -- in fact that has been removed) but use %bootstrap-mes instead (we did this at R-B), and also: update

New French PO file for 'guix-manual' (version 0.16.0.1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been submitted by the French team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix-manual/fr.po (We can arrange things

What's up with the .texi files always "changing"?

Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed) (use "git checkout -- ..." to discard changes in working directory) modified: doc/contributing.de.texi modified: doc/contributing.fr.texi modified: doc/guix.de.texi

Re-approaching package tagging

Hello, In the past when we've discussed package tagging, I think Ludo' has been against it, primarily because it's a giant source of bikeshedding. I agree that it's a huge space for bikeshedding... no space provides more bikeshedding than naming things, and tagging things is a many to many

Re: [GWL] (random) next steps?

Dear, > I’m working on updating the GWL manual to show a simple wispy example. Nice! I am also giving a deeper look at the manual. :-) > > Some GWL scripts are already there. > I only know of Roel’s ATACseq workflow[1], but we could add a few more > independent process definitions for simple

Re: Re-approaching package tagging

Il giorno lun 17 dic 2018 alle ore 22:10 swedebugia ha scritto: > Hi :) > > On 2018-12-17 20:01, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In the past when we've discussed package tagging, I think Ludo' has been > > against it, primarily because it's a giant source of bikeshedding. I

Re: [SECURITY] Which packages bundle sqlite?

I also want to know should we graft in this case since updating sqlite would cause ~4000s rebuilts. Besides, how to deal with packages that inherit sqlite when grafting? (e.g. sqlite-with-fts5 and sqlite-with-column-metadata) Thanks, Alex Alex Vong writes: > Hello Guix, > > Recently, a remote

Re: Target changes in OpenJDK

Hi Gábor, > Starting from OpenJDK 11 the jre target is deprecated. It can still be > built using a separate make target. > > I see three options here: > 1. Remove the separate jdk output and put the jdk to the out otuput. > This will be the way upstream will go anyway. > 2. Build the jre using

Going through the bugs...

Hi I looked through the list of bugs at https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=guix I commented on some that had not been active for a long time. Good luck hunting our bugs! Here are some stats: Outstanding bugs -- Serious bugs; Unclassified (4 bugs) #22883 [S|*| ] [guix] Trustable

Re: Going through the bugs...

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 02:39:53AM -0800, swedebu...@riseup.net wrote: > Here are more visual statistics: > https://debbugs.gnu.org/rrd/guix.html Close to linear growth.

Re: [bootstrappable] Re: GNU Mes 0.19 released

Hi Arne, > Do you have a document showing the bootstrap path — ideally in graph > form, i.e. with plantuml activity diagram? > http://plantuml.com/activity-diagram-legacy You can see the current bootstrap path here: https://bootstrappable.org/projects/mes.html This is without the path from

Re: GNU Mes 0.19 released

Very inspiring work ! Le 16 décembre 2018 21:21:21 GMT+01:00, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit : >We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.19, representing >100 commits over 10 weeks. > >Mes has now brought the Reduced Binary Seed bootstrap to Guix >(bootstrap >a GNU/Linux system without

[SECURITY] Which packages bundle sqlite?

Hello Guix, Recently, a remote execution vulnerability is discovered in sqlite[0][1]. Apart from updating the sqlite package, I think we need to update all packages bundling sqlite as well. What do you think? Cheers, Alex [0]: https://blade.tencent.com/magellan/index_en.html [1]:

Re: 01/01: gnu: mit-scheme: Update to 10.1.3.

Kei Kebreau writes: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > >> Hi Kei, >> >> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 13:51:43 -0500 >> Kei Kebreau wrote: >> >>> Understood. Thanks to you and Ludovic for cleaning up my small mess. >> >> I think it's only a workaround. >> >> What happened to the MIT scheme C fallback? I