July 14, 2022 6:24 AM, "zimoun" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:44, Joshua Branson wrote:
>
> Well, I am missing where it is announced. Could you be more specific?
Someone else already provided the link, but someone on irc did ask me
where the source code for HyperbolaBSD is? I
Thanks for sharing, even if accidental.
What a shame.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Marius,
Thank you for your work upgrading the core packages!
On the off chance that the following is helpful, in order to switch
the build to GCC 11 or 12 I had to apply the patch (with the missing
endif) from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017#c12
You may have avoided or
July 14, 2022 11:38 AM, "Vagrant Cascadian" wrote:
> On 2022-07-14, zimoun wrote:
>
>> Well, dreaming about science fiction, it appears me more approachable to
>> have Guix running on something as Debian/kfreeBSD – it could be an
>> interesting project with the help of Debian folks. Other said,
Thomas Lord was an early (or the first?) maintainer of guile
from https://berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2022-06-26/article/49837
Obituaries
Thomas Lord
1966-2022
Trina Pundurs
Monday June 27, 2022 - 05:21:00 PM
Thomas Lord was born April 26, 1966 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where
he lived
Greg Hogan skriver:
> On the off chance that the following is helpful, in order to switch
> the build to GCC 11 or 12 I had to apply the patch (with the missing
> endif) from
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017#c12
>
> You may have avoided or worked around this issue, but
July 14, 2022 9:06 AM, "zimoun" wrote:
> Hi Tobias, All,
>
> (French Bastille Day is a day off, so a day for trolling. ;-))
>
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 10:40, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>
>> https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announcing-hyperbolabsd-roadmap
>
> Thanks for the link. It is
sorry... the mail was meant to go to another mailing list...
Tom Lord had no direct relation to guix
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:30 PM Andy Tai wrote:
>
> Thomas Lord was an early (or the first?) maintainer of guile
>
> from https://berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2022-06-26/article/49837
>
>
July 15, 2022 7:23 AM, "Csepp" wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>
>
> If the goal is to produce highly secure servers than I'd like to suggest
> unikernels once again. No Guix running on the deployed server, but the
> server image is built by and possibly deployed by Guix.
> Of course the
Just wanted to add a packaging TODO for lagrange for when we get around to it:
https://github.com/skyjake/lagrange/issues/526
Should I send issues like this to guix-patc...@gnu.org instead?
all best,
jgart
Hi Guixers,
I just wanted to share this presentation that Singpolyma gave titled "Guix
Without Scheme":
https://archive.org/details/singpolyma-guix-without-scheme
Through the course of the presentation, singpolyma demos how to build
a Guix package with javascript as well as lua.
What do
Hi Ludo,
> https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2023/7/1
This is an excellent read! Are there plans to release this git
authentication system as a separate tool so that other non-Guix projects
may use it easily?
Thanks,
Arun
Hi!
Arun Isaac skribis:
> This is an excellent read! Are there plans to release this git
> authentication system as a separate tool so that other non-Guix projects
> may use it easily?
Not really. ‘guix git authenticate’ is already usable outside and the
modules behind it are well isolated
Ludovic Courtès 写道：
Honestly, I don’t think it’s worth bothering about the
non-substitutable
trick.
Agreed.
In practice, maradns should be able to rely on /dev/urandom at
run time, right?
That is my understanding.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ludovic Courtès schreef op vr 01-07-2022 om 14:57 [+0200]:
> Nitpick: it’s not that “the FSDG applies to Guix” but rather the Guix
> project chooses to follow the FSDG (info "(guix) Software Freedom").
OOps, I searched for 'FSDG' but not for 'free software distribution
guidelines' ...
Greetings,
Arun Isaac schreef op di 19-07-2022 om 12:51 [+0530]:
>
> Hi Ludo,
>
> > https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2023/7/1
>
> This is an excellent read! Are there plans to release this git
> authentication system as a separate tool so that other non-Guix
> projects may use it
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 18-07-2022 om 10:45 [+0200]:
> The model here is that users trust authorized committers. When you
> think about it, there’s no way around it, because at the end of the
> day, you’re installing software that an authorized committer added to
> the channel.
FWIW,
17 matches
Mail list logo
