On 31/07/2023 18:45, Csepp wrote:
Christina O'Donnell writes:
Hi guix and guixesses,
I'm still enjoying my guix machine crashing every other week despite changing all the software and half the hardware. So I'm trying to get kdump
working so I can get
Sorry, I've just seen this is a duplicate of
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64729. I should have checked there
first!
On 23/07/2023 20:15, Christina
O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Guix! This is my first time posting on a GNU mailing list so
Hi Guix! This is my first time posting on a GNU mailing list so
I'd appreciate feedback on clarity and wording.
I've run `guix pull` and `guix package -u` after a couple weeks
and I've hit a build failure:
builder for
Hi guix and guixesses,
I'm still enjoying my guix machine crashing every other week
despite changing all the software and half the hardware. So I'm
trying to get kdump working so I can get to the real reason behind
it. However I see that kdump-tools
Hi Oleg,
> I've added comments in commentary section in the top of the file
asking to
> keep packages alphabetically sorted seen in julia-xyz.scm as well.
> python-*.scm ordered semi random grouped closer to package purpose which
> require more thinking where to put a new one :-)
Ah, I
Hi again Oleg,
> > I think you may help! The identification of the group is still human
> > decision making process and I'm not sure it may be automated in any
point.
>
> I can certainly help with this then. I'll have some free time on
Friday and
> I can coordinate with you then.
Ah, I lost
Hi Felix,
You are welcome to use my Mumi clone at mumi.juix.org.
Bookmarked, thanks!
Looks like issues.guix.gnu.org is back up again.
Kind regards,
- Christina
On 04/02/2024 05:33, Felix Lechner wrote:
Hi Christina,
On Sat, Feb 03 2024, Christina O'Donnell wrote:
connecting to https
Hi Oleg,
I've pushed the split III to master.
Fantastic work!
I think you may help! The identification of the group is still human
decision making process and I'm not sure it may be automated in any point.
I can certainly help with this then. I'll have some free time on Friday and
I can
Hi,
Okay that's a better plan :)
Let's use Occam's razor for now. We have few common groups,
the task is to drop use-module (gnu packages golang) for each
of them by sorting packages into recently introduced modules.
Right, put the dependencies in of golang-web in golang-web (etc.) as
much
Hi Oleg,
On 13/01/2024 21:05, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I'm about to prepare split and aggregation of all golag packages
> related to cryptography. The process would be the same as for
> golang-check and golang-web.
>
>
> In progress:
> golang-cryptography
>
> Planned:
>
Hi Guix,
From my machine[1] connecting to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ results
in, after 130 seconds[2], a 502 bad gateway. It's been having issues for
over a week, but I only just found a need to test it.
I couldn't see an issue about it on debbugs so I thought it prudent to
raise an
Hi Simon,
The wishlist is: provide a machine-readable description on guix-science
channel side in order to help in finding the good overlap between
commits of different channels.
It could be nice if instead of an hard error, “guix pull” could say:
« the channel ’guix’ needs to be at least at
Hi Simon,
Sorry for the really long delay, I meant to reply after I'd had a good
read through the conversation you linked, but I haven't had a chance to
really get into it yet, but I have read enough to get a surface idea of
the project. The project looks fun, and looks like it will help Guix
Hi Steve,
On 02/04/2024 21:23, Steve George wrote:
Hi Christina - thanks for coming along today - I hope it was useful.
Yes I did find it helpful. Since I'm the least experienced out of
everyone there, I just stayed quiet and tried to absorb as much as I could.
It was good to see that not
on. It's actually quite fun!
Kind regards,
Christina
[2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?users=guix;bug=56576
On 03/04/2024 12:00, Christina O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 02/04/2024 21:23, Steve George wrote:
Hi Christina - thanks for coming along today - I hope it was useful
Hi Steve,
I just wanted to say that I enjoyed the first one of these and I'm
looking forward to today's session. I did want to go to the last
session, but I lost track of time and missed it!
I'm a new contributor who's only sent a few patches up, but these
sessions have been helpful for
Hi,
Thanks for your reply,
1. Changing the tag to reviewed-looks-good
It doesn't look like this worked. The way to do this is in the instructions are
4. 'Set a user tag' [0], probably the easiest way is to send an email (I do get
funny results sometimes with my email client):
Subject:
Correction:
On 18/04/2024 13:57, Christina O'Donnell wrote:
[...]
`guix store get-references`
`guix store get-referrers`
`guix store info` - dumps the `path-info`
`guix store put xyz` - puts xyz into the store as a fixed derivation
binary blob.
[...]
I've just checked and get-references
Hi,
In the interest of throwing ideas out there, and with the caveat that
this is rather uninformed:
I think having a derivation sub-command makes the most sense to me. E.g.
`guix derivation show` for `guix drv-show`
`guix derivation update` for `guix drv-drv` (or 'refresh' or 'fix')
I
Hi Steve,
On 24/04/2024 07:08, Steve George wrote:
Hi,
We're trying to stabilise and merge core-updates, help definitely wanted!
I'd love to help! Any of these issues novice-friendly?
Will there be a point release after core-updates is merged?
Kind regards,
Christina
/?id=fb86bf658a9374d41b05c5e586bfc6a3150cc3cb
and
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=452e7673bfeb0a14cecb8e760dda2c436aa69047
On 24 Apr, Christina O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 24/04/2024 07:08, Steve George wrote:
Hi,
We're trying to stabilise and merge core-updates, help
I've missded
then I'd appreciate that. Otherwise I'm free to pick it back up again on
Tuesday.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Kind regards,
Christina
Christina O'Donnell (4):
gnu: nss: Make reproducible.
gnu: nss: Update to 3.99.
gnu: nss-certs: Update to 3.99.
WIP: nss
There are 51 new test failures which all appear to be related to FIPS.
For example:
modutil -dbdir
/tmp/guix-build-nss-3.99.drv-0/nss-3.99/tests_results/security/localhost.1/fips
-fips true
WARNING: Performing this operation while the browser is running could cause
corruption of your security
From: Zheng Junjie
* gnu/packages/nss.scm (nss)[arguments]<#:make-flags>: When
cross-compilation, Add CROSS_COMPILE=1.
<#:phases>: When cross-compilation, Set env NATIVE_CC to gcc.
Change-Id: I5c9559a4b8cecf2cfc6c47d136d69c01a335faaf
Signed-off-by: Zheng Junjie
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 7
gnu/packages/nss.scm (nss): Update to 3.99.
Change-Id: Iba6c9dc2956cc0febb62a1c471add899250fa489
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/nss.scm b/gnu/packages/nss.scm
index b608a995577..80667d8affe 100644
---
From: Zheng Junjie
* gnu/packages/nss.scm (nspr)[arguments]<#:configure-flags>: When
cross-compilation, Add HOST_CC=gcc.
Change-Id: I337f217f153f8cc3a713906643d6fab9115056e9
Signed-off-by: Zheng Junjie
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
gnu/packages/certs.scm (nss-certs-3.88.1): New variable.
(nss-certs-3.98): Update and rename to nss-certs-3.99.
(nss-certs): Update to 3.99.
Change-Id: I2f5f737d44d08497d4f5e0e07557be36d2f1f070
---
gnu/packages/certs.scm | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5
b834755822f962af29e9395daa7338084e21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+Message-ID:
<4734b834755822f962af29e9395daa7338084e21.1714059680.git@mutix.org>
+From: Christina O'Donnell
+Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:35:50 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] nss: Disable library signing.
+
+---
+ nss/cmd/shlibsign
Hi Steve,
It would be good to confirm this one:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40316
Still fails to reproduce with those changes applied.
The culprit is in nss/cmd/shlibsign/shlibsign.c:
shlibSignHMAC generates a new key-pair each time it's run:
/* Generate a DSA key
Hi,
I believe I have a fix for this, I'm just waiting on my machine to hurry
up and confirm it, might end up running over night, then I'll send my
patch up.
I'm doing two native builds and two cross-builds.
I've also updated to 3.99.
Kind regards,
Christina
On 25/04/2024 15:06, Christina
Hi,
Just to say that I'm looking forward to today's session! I'll try my
best to be less quiet this time :-)
Kind regards,
Christina
On 12/04/2024 12:33, Steve George wrote:
Hi,
Our next online social and patch review session is on Monday (15th April):
17:00 UTC; 18:00 London; 19:00
Hi,
On 06/05/2024 11:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
Tangentially, given how long nss takes to build, do you think that
it'd be worth shaving it down to a single test pass? Currently it runs
each test up to 3 times, which takes ~1h on my machine with no other
machine with no other build
running. Running only the standard pass takes 2.5-3x less time, which is
a huge quality of life improvement.
Kind regards,
Christina
On 02/05/2024 09:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Christina,
Nice work!
Christina O'Donnell skribis:
I've got as far as making nss
Hi,
On 08/05/2024 14:01, Christopher Baines wrote:
I think it would be nice to have a new release, and indeed release more
often, I think the way to get there is for less things to be broken
between releases, such that releasing takes less effort in terms of
testing and fixing things.
To give
34 matches
Mail list logo
