Hi,
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:28:31 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions. I pushed the packages.
>
> Is there a git repo somewhere I can pull your uboot stuff from? I'd
> like to test it =)
There's no such repo right now.
I'd prefer merging into master soon to creating a fork
with what I have here :) )
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès
;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosavljevic
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
;;; under
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:53:10 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> I made some stylistic changes, updated the license, updated to 1.4.1,
> removed the patches (checked the arch package and the nixos package,
> both don't patch dtc)
>
> I forgot to add u-boot.scm to local.mk...
>
> Danny, WDYT? Is it an i
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:51:45 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> So I think that dtc and uboot are good now, I'll give it a few days
> before merging...
>
> I'm getting an Unbound variable: error :/
>
> Here's my bootloader configuration. Any suggestions? =)
>
> (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:51:45 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> So I think that dtc and uboot are good now, I'll give it a few days
> before merging...
>
> I'm getting an Unbound variable: error :/
>
> Here's my bootloader configuration. Any suggestions? =)
>
> (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
>
> > (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
> >(board "vexpress_ca9x4")
> >(device "/dev/sdX")
> >(u-boot armhf-linux-uboot)))
Note: It should infer the correct u-boot to use on its own - at least that's
the intention with the whole make-u-boot-packag
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:52:23 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> > > (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
> > >(board "vexpress_ca9x4")
> > >(device "/dev/sdX")
> > >(u-boot armhf-linux-uboot
If I forgot any other things, see my working copy
http://www.scratchpost.org/software/Guix/guix.tar.gz - warning: there be
dragons.
The existing files that I touched for U-Boot are:
./gnu/build/vm.scm ; initialize-hard-disk has a key #:grub.cfg
./gnu/build/install.scm ; actual invocation of gru
> +(define (make-u-boot-package board triplet xgcc)
...
> + (begin
> + (display "Invalid boardname. Valid boardnames would
> have been:")
> + (newline)
> + (system* "ls" "-1" "configs")
> + #f)
I
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:27:52 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> (find-files "." ".*\\.(bin|efi)$"))
Also in order to support Novena it should be
(find-files "." ".*\\.(bin|efi|spl)$"))
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:20:30 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> > Note: It should infer the correct u-boot to use on its own - at least
> > that's the intention with the whole make-u-boot-package thing.
>
> Did you see the updated u-boot patch? It includes support for
> cross-compilation,
Nice!
>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:56:53 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> FYI your editor is using dos style /n/r newlines. Don't know if that
> is your intention. Are you on windows? O.O xD
Thanks for the heads-up!
No, it's nano on GuixSD. (Guile emacs on Guix broke a long time ago and while
there was a worka
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:29:40 +0200
David Craven wrote:
>So for booting a vm we don't actually need a boot loader, since it passes the
>kernel image through the -kernel flag.
Huh, that appears to be the case. Back when I used VMs the first time they
simulated the entire PC, BIOS and all and th
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:54:27 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> for actual boards, isn't uboot usually written to flash instead of to a MBR?
That depends on the board - sometimes it's written to flash.
For Allwinner hardware, it's written to a fixed section (fixed sectors) on
either a SD card or NAND
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 23:19:30 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> So I'd say the next steps are:
>
> 1. Pick out your changes that are related to renaming grub to
> bootloader and add a shim for the uboot parts. That should be enough
> to get vm's booting.
Yes. Note that Ludo said that it might mak
Before I forget it again - maybe it makes sense to always generate and install
both the U-Boot and the Grub configuration file. While the bootloaders are
[probably] mutually exclusive, I don't think that the config files are!
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:35 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> >> 1. Pick out your changes that are related to renaming grub to
> >> bootloader and add a shim for the uboot parts. That should be enough
> >> to get vm's booting.
>
> > Yes. Note that Ludo said that it might make sense to separate the
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (mtd-utils): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 07fd6e5..7ab9b3c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lin
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Update to 0.17.1.
* gnu/packages/patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch: New patch.
* gnu/local.mk: Added reference to patch.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 39 +-
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch | 84 ++
This patch series fixes ldc up so it works again and updates it to the newest
C++-bootstrappable version.
Danny Milosavljevic (3):
gnu: ldc: make isnan and isinf work.
gnu: Add python-lit, python2-lit.
gnu: update ldc to 0.17.1.
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 33
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-lit, python2-lit): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 26 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 77bb8a4..070bef4 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/pa
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Added substitution.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/ldc.scm b/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
index 1709f59..601804a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
@@ -101,6 +101,12 @@ and freshness wi
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:19:03 +0200
Pjotr Prins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> > ldc is broken since May 2016.
> >
> > http://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/ldc-0.16.1.x86_64-linux
> >
> > hmmm.
>
> Include file gone missing:
I've posted a patch to fix
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:08:17 +0300
Alex Kost wrote:
> It would be good if you write a comment before licenses, like what files
> have what licenses. Also is it really 'gpl2'? If the license says "or
> any later version", it should be 'gpl2+'.
They are:
./compr.c: " * JFFS2 -- Journalling Fla
index 000..6649456
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosavljevic
+;;;
+;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
+;;;
+;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* gnu/packages/arduino.scm (arduino-makefile): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 81
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/arduino.scm b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
index 6649456..0305e51 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ardui
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: Add arduino-libraries.
gnu: Add arduino-makefile.
gnu/local.mk | 2 +
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 171 +++
2 files changed, 173 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/arduino.scm
b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
new file mode 100644
index 000..6649456
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosavljevic
+;;;
+;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
+;;;
+;;; GNU Guix is free
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: Add arduino-libraries.
gnu: Add arduino-makefile.
gnu/local.mk | 2 +
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 171 +++
2 files changed, 173 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/arduino.scm
* gnu/packages/arduino.scm (arduino-makefile): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 81
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/arduino.scm b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
index 6649456..0305e51 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ardui
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-lit, python2-lit): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 26 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 77bb8a4..070bef4 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/pa
This patch series fixes ldc up so it works again and updates it to the newest
C++-bootstrappable version.
Danny Milosavljevic (3):
gnu: ldc: make isnan and isinf work.
gnu: Add python-lit, python2-lit.
gnu: update ldc to 0.17.1.
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 33
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Update to 0.17.1.
* gnu/packages/patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch: New patch.
* gnu/local.mk: Added reference to patch.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 39 +-
.../patches/
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Added substitution.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/ldc.scm b/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
index 1709f59..601804a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
@@ -101,6 +101,12 @@ and freshness wi
* gnu/packages/arduino.scm (arduino-makefile): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 81
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/arduino.scm b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
index 5309587..08ed1cf 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ardui
/arduino.scm
new file mode 100644
index 000..5309587
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosavljevic
+;;;
+;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
+;;;
+;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: Add arduino-libraries.
gnu: Add arduino-makefile.
gnu/local.mk | 2 +
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 172 +
...aries-hardware-remove-__cxa_guard_acquire.patch | 13 ++
3 files
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: Add arduino-libraries.
gnu: Add arduino-makefile.
gnu/local.mk | 2 +
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 172 +
...aries-hardware-remove-__cxa_guard_acquire.patch | 13 ++
3 files
* gnu/packages/arduino.scm (arduino-makefile): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 81
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/arduino.scm b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
index 5309587..08ed1cf 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ardui
/arduino.scm
new file mode 100644
index 000..5309587
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosavljevic
+;;;
+;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
+;;;
+;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can
* gnu/packages/arduino.scm (arduino-makefile): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 81
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/arduino.scm b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
index 5309587..08ed1cf 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ardui
/arduino.scm
new file mode 100644
index 000..5309587
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/arduino.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosavljevic
+;;;
+;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
+;;;
+;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: Add arduino-libraries.
gnu: Add arduino-makefile.
gnu/local.mk | 2 +
gnu/packages/arduino.scm | 172 +
...aries-hardware-remove-__cxa_guard_acquire.patch | 13 ++
3 files
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:02:55 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > + (let ((avr-gcc (assoc-ref inputs "avr-gcc-5"))
> > + (avr-binutils (assoc-ref inputs "avr-binutils")))
> > + (substitute* "bin/ard-reset-arduino"
> > +(("#!/usr/bi
> As this is only used by “arduino-libraries” and probably no other
> package I’d move this into the definition of “arduino-libraries”.
I suppressed arduino-core in this patch series. It will be used by others.
> Could you expand the description a little? Maybe one more sentence.
What should I
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:40:57 +0200
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> > + (lambda* (#:key outputs make-flags #:allow-other-keys)
> > + (let ((configname (string-append ,board "_defconfig")))
>
> Should be ‘config-name’ per our conventions, but ‘config’ is pr
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: Add dtc.
gnu: Add u-boot.
gnu/local.mk | 4 +
gnu/packages/patches/dtc-01_build_doc.patch| 22 +++
...t-Add-missing-functions-to-shared-library.patch | 30 +
...t-Add-some-missing-symbols-to-version.lds.patch
gnu: Add u-boot.
* gnu/packages/u-boot.scm (u-boot, make-u-boot-package,
armhf-linux-uboot, mips64el-linux-uboot): New variables.
Co-authored-by: David Craven
---
gnu/packages/u-boot.scm | 90 ++---
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
ocal:
+ *;
+--
+2.8.1
+
diff --git a/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm b/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm
new file mode 100644
index 000..5f3fd49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Danny Milosav
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:59:11 +0200
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Are there GPLv2 license headers that lack the “or any later version”
> wording, or anything that explicitly says “version 2 only”? If not,
> it’s v2-or-later.
./ftl_format.c: ' Ported to MTD system. * Based on:
===
gnu: Add mtd-utils.
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (mtd-utils): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index aac2cd1..4c690a6 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+
gnu: dtc: Add missing exports:
- fdt_first_subnode
- fdt_next_subnode
- fdt_address_cells
- fdt_size_cells
- fdt_stringlist_contains
- fdt_resize
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
.../patches/dtc-add-missing-symbols-to-lds.patch | 59
Hi David,
I've posted just the one patch that is adding the exports now.
Leaving those exports out was certainly an oversight by the dtc developers.
Not adding them would mean that libfdt.h contained prototypes for functions
which don't exist. This is something that is really annoying to have as
Hi Ricardo,
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:57:32 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> > + (substitute* "bin/ard-reset-arduino"
>> > +(("#!/usr/bin/env python") "#!/usr/bin/python3"))
>>
> >> This looks unnecessary. When “python-wrapper” is among the inputs the
> >> shebang w
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 20:44:20 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> I don't know about this. I thought propagated meant that if I installed
> arduino-makefile into the profile it would also install avrdude into the
> profile. That is not what I wanted. The Makefile refers to the
* gnu/packages/tsl.scm (asn1c): New variable.
^^ typo
Otherwise LGTM! Someone can probably fix that up when pushing.
Hi,
they've integrated these patches into their new dtc release 1.4.2 :)
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 -
.../patches/dtc-add-missing-symbols-to-lds.patch | 59 --
gnu/packages/u-boot.scm| 6 +--
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/dtc
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 -
.../patches/dtc-add-missing-symbols-to-lds.patch | 59 --
gnu/packages/u-boot.scm| 6 +--
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/dtc
> I wonder if it makes sense to have a single “armhf” configuration. My
> understanding is that the config is often tweaked for the specific ARM
> board that is targeted.
Even worse, it used to be the case that ARM kernels only worked on one specific
ARM board.
However, the multi configuration
(mwhen grub?
- (install-grub* (derivation->output-path grub.cfg)
-device "/"
+ (install-bootloader* (derivation->output-path grub)
+ (derivation->output-path grub.cfg)
+
Hi Hartmut,
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:32:44 +0200
Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> When specifying #:jar-file, the ant-builder will create a build.xml.
> This build.xml did not include a test-target at all. So one *always* had
> to include "#:tests? #f" to disable calling the (non-existing)
> test-target - o
Whoops, now with the correct u-boot.scm
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 21:58:03 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I thought I'd post a minimal version for U-Boot support without any renames
> that aren't absolutely necessary. In this way, the patch is quite smal
Hi Jan,
On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 10:43:28 +0200
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Added an -g/--exclude-.git option for guix hash. It is very specific:
> it skips toplevel .git directory.
Why?
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:03:34 +0200
Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> for some package I need to switch the install and check phase. Could
> please someone point me to a function like "move-phase-after"? Thanks.
I don't think this exists yet.
See the ./guix/build/utils.scm for the macro definition.
Hi,
it works for me (and has been adapted from the newer lua's patch where it also
worked) and it's necessary for celestia.
No idea why it's still pending...
Maybe something like this (has NOT been tested):
diff --git a/guix/build/utils.scm b/guix/build/utils.scm
index 2988193..c2cf25d 100644
--- a/guix/build/utils.scm
+++ b/guix/build/utils.scm
@@ -517,6 +517,7 @@ following forms:
(replace )
(add-before )
(add-after )
+ (move-after )
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:36:35 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> Not syslog, but helps with debugging...
That definitely helps - however, in the long run, I think that using syslog is
better. Syslog does the splitting up in different files (or not) and onto
different machines (or not), filtering (or no
Hi Leo,
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:49:41 -0400
Leo Famulari wrote:
> I imported the acl module, used #:make-flags to set PREFIX, and made a
> minor adjustment to the description.
>
> What do you think?
Looks good and works :)
---
gnu/packages/u-boot.scm | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm b/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm
index e9a4b90..7949d8a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/u-boot.scm
@@ -47,15 +47,11 @@
("flex" ,flex)))
(
Hi David,
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:15:29 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> LGTM. Are these changes part of the debian patchset?
No, I found out that GNU make allows you to override variables used inside
Makefiles from make's command line.
To test:
write a Makefile containing:
#-
PREFIX = /foo
a
Hi Ludo,
does that mean we can fix guile-emacs?
I've just updated to the latest version that is in Guix and I get:
Throw to key system-error with args ("load-thunk-from-memory" "A" ("No such
file or directory") (2))Threads explicit registering is not previously enabled.
The same problem existe
Ping. This is the newest version of the patch series that includes the changes
you suggested.
> + `("--without-tcp-wrappers"
^^^
Since you also provided tcp-wrappers in a seperate patch, was this on purpose?
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 22:49:12 +0200
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> I don’t know.
>What you describe sounds a lot like a search path issue.
It is a search path issue.
Does package-for-guile-2.2 take it into account?
Your E-mail contains:
The following environment variable definitio
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:15:22 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>export PATH="foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH"
>export
> GUILE_LOAD_PATH="foo/share/guile/site/2.0${GUILE_LOAD_PATH:+:}$GUILE_LOAD_PATH"
>export
> GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH="foo/lib/g
Hi David,
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:09:12 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> Why aren't you using git format-patch? :)
>
> git format-patch -1
> git send-email *.patch --to guix-devel@gnu.org
>
> is what I do...
That's exactly what I do too - the exact same commands. I don't know what
magical options o
Hi,
I think that's because I set it up to use attachments (Luda asked me to).
The E-Mail, raw as git send-email sent it, looks like this:
From 7e7c30119aebab0ee48c4e55d8c7471f0fde487c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Danny Milosavljevic
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:44:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH
Hi David,
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 00:09:57 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> I'm testing your new u-boot code. I fixed a few bugs, but there is
> still some work to do... ;-)
>
> guix system vm u-boot-test.scm --no-grub
>
> This should work without giving any errors and boot (it doesn't matter
>
New wip patch attached - applies to git guix...
diff --git a/gnu.scm b/gnu.scm
index 932e4cd..9207e38 100644
--- a/gnu.scm
+++ b/gnu.scm
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
(gnu system mapped-devices)
(gnu system file-systems)
(gnu system grub) ; 'grub-configuration
Hi,
how do I use "every" in a guix package declaration?
When I add #:modules (sfri sfri-1) I get a message that guix-build is undefined
(?).
;; FIXME import "every" somehow
(define-public pypy3.3
(package
(name "pypy3.3")
(version "5.2.0")
(source (origin
(method url
diff --git a/gnu.scm b/gnu.scm
index 932e4cd..9207e38 100644
--- a/gnu.scm
+++ b/gnu.scm
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
(gnu system mapped-devices)
(gnu system file-systems)
(gnu system grub) ; 'grub-configuration'
+(gnu system u-boot)
Hi David,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:02:53 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> It still doesn't work. Can you please also include gnu system u-boot
> in the patch?
git randomly decided to leave things off the patch when I do "git diff". Sigh.
> It's nice if you can simply apply (all required) patches and
t; #$size #$image #$output)
+(define (grub-configuration-package config os)
+ grub)
+
(define* (grub-background-image config #:key (width 1024) (height 768))
"Return the GRUB background image defined in CONFIG with a ratio of
WIDTH/HEIGHT, or #f if none was found."
diff -
> I suppose “zImage” is for ARM, right?
Yes. Newer U-Boot support booting from zImage (using command "bootz" on the
U-Boot prompt).
(Older U-Boot needed a special "uImage" which had beeen created by a tool
"mkimage" which contain loader (target) information (using command "bootm" on
the U-Boot
> I think we should probably say this package is NCSA, since it's part of
> LLVM. What do you think?
I agree.
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Update to 0.17.1.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 15 ++-
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch | 147 +
2 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ldc-0.17.1-
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Added substitution. Added zlib input. Fix llvm
and clang inputs to 3.7.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/ldc.scm b/gnu/packages/ldc.scm
index 1709f59..560fa49 100644
--- a/gnu
Fixes ldc and updates it to the latest C++-bootstrappable version.
Danny Milosavljevic (3):
gnu: Add python-lit, python2-lit.
gnu: Make ldc work again (patch isnan, isinf).
gnu: Update ldc to 0.17.1.
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 31 +++--
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-lit, python2-lit): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 26 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index b839f22..eb407c2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/p
gnu: Update ldc to 0.17.1.
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Update to 0.17.1.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 22 +--
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch | 147 +
2 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gnu/
Sigh. Yeah, I've researched a bit why that happens.
The story is this:
glibc wanted to have isinf work with double AND float etc without conversion.
Therefore, there is a special gcc construct where you can find out what type a
parameter is IN A MACRO. Therefore, in C, isnan is a macro and so i
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Changed.
* gnu/packages/patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch: New patch.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 24 ++--
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch | 147 +
2 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 10 deleti
gnu: Update ldc to 0.17.1.
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Changed.
* gnu/packages/patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch: New patch.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 24 +++---
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch | 86 ++
2 files changed,
gnu: Update ldc to 0.17.1.
* gnu/packages/ldc.scm (ldc): Changed.
* gnu/packages/patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch: New patch.
---
gnu/packages/ldc.scm | 25 ---
.../patches/ldc-0.17.1-disable-tests.patch | 86 ++
2 files changed,
> + (patches (list (search-patch "llvm-for-extempore.patch")))
Hmm... is this patch file somewhere?
> >> +(home-page "http://mcelog.org/";)
> > Nit-pick: the trailing slash is unnecessary :)
If you don't include the trailing slash it will require an additional
round-trip to the server in order to add it via a (302) redirect.
DESTDIR is a feature which lets you install into a tempdir. The idea is that
you install it all there and then atomically replace the ORIGINAL version at
the non-DESTDIR location.
It's very bad to set DESTDIR to out because the outdir is used after
installation, too (your program will stay at t
Hi,
> With this patch I got:
>
> The following tests FAILED:
> 238 - std.datetime (Failed)
> 296 - std.regex.internal.tests (Failed)
> 568 - std.datetime-debug (Failed)
> 626 - std.regex.internal.tests-debug (Failed)
> 670 - dmd-testsuite-debug (Failed)
Huh really?
I just cloned the guix git re
gnu: Update flashrom to 0.9.9
* gnu/packages/flashing-tools.scm (flashrom): Changed.
* gnu/packages/patches/flashrom-use-libftdi1.patch: Removed.
* gnu/local.mk: Remove mention of "flashrom-use-libftdi1.patch".
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 -
gnu/packages/flashing-to
1 - 100 of 1408 matches
Mail list logo
