Dear List,
During the course of creating a port for OpenMolcas, I discovered that
it requires the 64-bit interface to OpenBLAS. My understanding is that
this promotes INTEGER to be 64-bit, so that arrays longer than 2**32-1
are supported. It was easy enough to shoe-horn in INTERFACE64=1 to
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> We, a group of GNU maintainers sharing a vision for a stronger GNU
> Project, are publishing this statement today:
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/
>
> We are somewhat abusing the Guix blog here, for lack of a
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
> There are two cases:
>
> 1. Packages that depend on both ‘lapack’ and ‘openblas’. This is
> almost always a mistake because ‘openblas’ provides the same
> interfaces as ‘lapack’, only with a more efficient implementation.
>
> 2. Packages that
Hi Ludo'!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Brown skribis:
>
> Are there other cases where netlib BLAS is considered more appropriate
> than OpenBLAS because it’s more numerically stable?
>
Sorry about that, the full discussion is here:
https://cran.r-proj
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Brown skribis:
>
>> There are scenarios where reference BLAS is more stable and/or
>> reproducible than optimized BLAS libraries. Sometimes its lack of
>> knowledge of OpenBLAS and/or a numerical issue.
>>
>
kiasoc5 writes:
> I just realized that this downloads all packages into the store, which not the
> same as installing all the packages into one or many profiles. I wonder what
> the
> minimum set of profiles to install all packages while avoiding collisions
> might
> be?
Correct, my reply was
Andy Tai writes:
> It should be; openmotif was just some kind of marketing term
>
> Although guix has some existing packages using lesstif, the now dead
> early motif clone (as free software) and I don't know if emacs may be
> using that...
>
Thanks for the clarification. My interest in this
"jgart" writes:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> How would you approach writing a script that installs every Guix package
> exhaustively for your current revision?
>
> I'm thinking of something similar to `all-packages` on PyPi but for every
> Guix package (the whole wide ️).
>
>
kiasoc5 writes:
> Surely if there are outstanding questions that could be answered by installing
> all packages, they could be answered in another way?
I do this to keep packages as reasonably close to "locked and loaded" as
possible (including all external channels) so that when I need them
Andy Tai writes:
> Hi, motif was a major component of Unix for many years and it would be
> good to add the (now free software) motif to GNU Guix. Can package
> reviewers take a look of the patch in this issue
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59092
>
> Thanks
Hello Andy:
By chance is this the
10 matches
Mail list logo
