Canan Talayhan writes:
> Thanks for your quick response. It helps a lot to me. But still, I
> have some confusion about the reproduction steps. As I understand it,
> I can reproduce the slow query just using the pure SQL queries without
> touching the code for now, right?
>
> Please find my
Thanks for your quick response. It helps a lot to me. But still, I
have some confusion about the reproduction steps. As I understand it,
I can reproduce the slow query just using the pure SQL queries without
touching the code for now, right?
Please find my steps below:
1. CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE
Christopher Baines writes:
> The approach I'd recommend is, make yourself a realistic
> temp_package_metadata table by populating it with all the
> package_metadata entries for a single revision already in your local
> database. Then construct and try the slow query, and see how long it
>
Canan Talayhan writes:
> It seems after testing lots of pages this one escaped me since I only
> tested the working case.
>
> Please find the quick fix in the link below.
> https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/s7tWyPHZ8F/
Great, that fixes the issue with the revision comparison page.
> I'm looking
It seems after testing lots of pages this one escaped me since I only
tested the working case.
Please find the quick fix in the link below.
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/s7tWyPHZ8F/
I'm looking forward to making another contribution. Could you please
review it as soon as possible?
Thanks,
Canan
Canan Talayhan writes:
> I've missed it unintentionally. I've not touched the "@" sign this time. :)
>
>>> + (define page-header "Comparing")
> >> +
> >> (layout
> >> + #:title
> >> + (string-append page-header " " (string-take base-commit 8) " and "
> >> + (string-take
I've missed it unintentionally. I've not touched the "@" sign this time. :)
>> + (define page-header "Comparing")
>> +
>> (layout
>> + #:title
>> + (string-append page-header " " (string-take base-commit 8) " and "
>> + (string-take target-commit 8))
>>#:body
>>
Canan Talayhan writes:
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
>>Why's the @ being removed here?
> It interprets like an HTML code when I use the page-header like
> `,page-header, so I removed it. According to your comment, I reverted
> to the original version.
>
> " 'GET repository..." which
Thanks for your quick response.
>Why's the @ being removed here?
It interprets like an HTML code when I use the page-header like
`,page-header, so I removed it. According to your comment, I reverted
to the original version.
" 'GET repository..." which includes package/package-name in the URL
has
Canan Talayhan writes:
> I've updated the patch that contains all the suggestions. I think the patch
> is ready to merge.
>
> One thing that I would like to ask you about the package and package-name
> in web/repository/controller.scm.
>
> When I test the URL below I'm getting this error. (
>
Hi Chris,
I've updated the patch that contains all the suggestions. I think the patch
is ready to merge.
One thing that I would like to ask you about the package and package-name
in web/repository/controller.scm.
When I test the URL below I'm getting this error. (
Canan Talayhan writes:
> After your suggestions, I've fixed the patch. But for the revision
> part, I have a question. You said "I'd put "Channel News Entries"
> first, then the Revision bit second." There are so many titles like
> this structure in Revision views.
>
> For example :
> ->System
Hi again,
@Chris
After your suggestions, I've fixed the patch. But for the revision
part, I have a question. You said "I'd put "Channel News Entries"
first, then the Revision bit second." There are so many titles like
this structure in Revision views.
For example :
->System tests Revision
Canan Talayhan writes:
> Hi team,
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> @Chris
> After all the modifications that I've made according to your comments,
> I've created the latest version of my patch.
> Could you please review the patch attached and share your ideas?
>
> Please note that a few parts are
Hi team,
Thanks for your help.
@Chris
After all the modifications that I've made according to your comments,
I've created the latest version of my patch.
Could you please review the patch attached and share your ideas?
Please note that a few parts are left. After your confirmation, I can
handle
On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 18:56 +0300, Canan Talayhan wrote:
> [...]
> After sending the patch I've turned the patch like below.
> (title ,(if title
> `,(string-append title " - Guix Data Service")
> '("Guix Data Service")))
A little more simplification is possible:
Hi Maxime,
Is this ‘introductory task’ publicly available? If so, could you post a
> link?
I'm not up-to-date with Outreachy.
>
It's not available under the Official Outreachy page if you're not logged
in.
> Typographical nitpick: I would use a proper dash here (the figure dash ‒
> or the —
On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 12:01 +0300, Canan Talayhan wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Welcome!
> My name is Canan. I'm an Outreachy applicant. I'm working on the introductory
> task for
> Guix Data Service.
Is this ‘introductory task’ publicly available? If so, could you post a link?
I'm not up-to-date with
18 matches
Mail list logo
