Hi!
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
[...]
> first and foremost, IMHO guix-devel is not the place to discuss GNU FSDG
> criteria; I'm going to subscribe gnu-linux-li...@nongnu.org to send
> my comments - and I _have_ some - on the FSDG compliance process
then I decided to "escalate" this issue since
Hi guix-devel!
this is my humble contribution to this discussion...
(I'm not a Guix maintainer)
first and foremost, IMHO guix-devel is not the place to discuss GNU FSDG
criteria; I'm going to subscribe gnu-linux-li...@nongnu.org to send
my comments - and I _have_ some - on the FSDG compliance
Hello, bill! Thanks for your clarifications!
Really, is it possible to make chromium free software?
Also, FSF free software directory can divide packages by criteria like
1) Totally free GNU - open-source and free license GPL
2) Totally free nonGNU - - open-source and free license non-GPL
3)
Hello,
ezt írta (időpont: 2019. febr. 16., Szo, 13:56):
>
> I think it's unreasonable to assume that everyone involved in GNU Distros
> reads and participates in gnu-linux-li...@nongnu.org discussions. You have
> a limited amount of time for projects, and this other mailinglist, when I
> used to
bill-auger writes:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:34:45 +0100 Ludovic wrote:
>> It’s not entirely clear to me what the problems are, to be honest.
>
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 22:04:59 +0100 Marius wrote:
>> Indeed, the only real breakthrough is that we now have a script to
>> create an Ungooglified
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:34:45 +0100 Ludovic wrote:
> It’s not entirely clear to me what the problems are, to be honest.
On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 22:04:59 +0100 Marius wrote:
> Indeed, the only real breakthrough is that we now have a script to
> create an Ungooglified source tarball with all
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi bill-auger,
>
> bill-auger skribis:
>
>> re: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg9.html
>>
>> i would like to remind readers of the guix-devel list that it was
>> discussed some months ago, why no FSDG distros currently distribute
>>
Hi bill-auger,
bill-auger skribis:
> re: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg9.html
>
> i would like to remind readers of the guix-devel list that it was
> discussed some months ago, why no FSDG distros currently distribute
> chromium[1] - it appeared at that time, that
As always, I second Bill here. There is a lot of history behind the
Chromium project that I think many of us are aware of. There, to my
knowledge, remains to be a complete audit of the Chromium source. Such
an audit is crucial for us to even know what is problematic and what is
not when it
re: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg9.html
i would like to remind readers of the guix-devel list that it was
discussed some months ago, why no FSDG distros currently distribute
chromium[1] - it appeared at that time, that most people in that
discussion were in
Hello Marius,
Thanks for your work patching and packaging ungoogled-chromium!
I haven’t had a chance to have a closer look at your patch, but would
you mind elaborating on the “* Free software only.” part of your stated
feature-set and if/how it addresses licensing concerns raised previously
Marius Bakke writes:
> Thanks to Marks beautiful "computed-origin-method", Ungoogled-Chromium
> is finally ready for inclusion in Guix.
>
> Features:
> * Chromium 72.
> * No unsolicited network traffic.
> * Free software only.
> * No DRM.
> * Not an April Fools joke.
Ahh man. I was really
12 matches
Mail list logo
