Ah I see. Yes that makes sense...
David
David Craven skribis:
>> Not sure I understand the problem. ‘mcron-jobs’ wouldn’t collide with
>> anything else AFAICS, and it would be clearer than just ‘jobs’ no?
>
> What I mean is that mcron-jobs assumes that the mcron-service is used.
> Calling it something general like
> Not sure I understand the problem. ‘mcron-jobs’ wouldn’t collide with
> anything else AFAICS, and it would be clearer than just ‘jobs’ no?
What I mean is that mcron-jobs assumes that the mcron-service is used.
Calling it something general like jobs or cron-jobs wouldn't require
renaming, if
David Craven skribis:
>> Should we add rottlog-service and thus mcron-service to
>> ‘%base-services’? Is log rotation a basic feature that people expect?
>> WDYT?
>
> Why not. There's two sorts of people. The ones that don't care/know
> will be happy when things just work and
> Should we add rottlog-service and thus mcron-service to
> ‘%base-services’? Is log rotation a basic feature that people expect?
> WDYT?
Why not. There's two sorts of people. The ones that don't care/know
will be happy when things just work and the ones that care/know are
probably defining
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Should we add rottlog-service and thus mcron-service to ‘%base-services’?
I'd say no, or do like OS configurations and provide a %bare-bones-services,
or do it the other way, provide an optional %default-services
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Should we add rottlog-service and thus mcron-service to
> ‘%base-services’? Is log rotation a basic feature that people expect?
> WDYT?
What's the size of mcron and its dependency graph of unique packages
which aren't already pulled in