Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2019-05-19 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, Mykola Nikishov ezt írta (időpont: 2019. máj. 19., V, 12:23): > Gábor Boskovits writes: > > >> > Also we can simply turn off the timestamp generation > >> > unconditionally... > >> > >> Number 2 sounds good, and why not giving it a try to place it upstream? > > > > Ok, i will go for it,

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2019-05-19 Thread Mykola Nikishov
Gábor Boskovits writes: >> > Also we can simply turn off the timestamp generation >> > unconditionally... >> >> Number 2 sounds good, and why not giving it a try to place it upstream? > > Ok, i will go for it, and try to get it upsreamed for jdk8 and jdk11. Gábor, do you have anything to share?

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-15 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Gabor, > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables > generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp. > Currently I see two ways forward: > 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls. > 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-14 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 14., V, 8:43): > > Chris Marusich ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > 14., V, 5:35): > > > > Hi Gábor and Vagrant, > > > > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > > > > > There's been some discussion about this in Debian and in reproducible > > > builds: > > > > >

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-14 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Chris Marusich ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 14., V, 5:35): > > Hi Gábor and Vagrant, > > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > > > There's been some discussion about this in Debian and in reproducible > > builds: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/783938 > > > > > >

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-13 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Gábor and Vagrant, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > There's been some discussion about this in Debian and in reproducible > builds: > > https://bugs.debian.org/783938 > > > https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc > > >

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-13 Thread Alex Vong
Hello, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2018-10-12, Björn Höfling wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 >> Gábor Boskovits wrote: >>> Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. >>> 12., P, 19:00): >>> > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. >>> > There is a command line

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2018-10-12, Björn Höfling wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: >> Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. >> 12., P, 19:00): >> > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. >> > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that >> >

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 20:01): > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > > > Hello guix, > > > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > > There is

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Björn Höfling
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > Hello guix, > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that > > disables generating the

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 19:00): > > Hello guix, > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables > generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp. > Currently I see two ways