Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> Is the bioconductor importer usable from `guix import` ?
>
> yes. You may encounter minor problems when using the recursive
> bioconductor importer, as it may try to look up CRAN packages on
> Bioconductor.
This is now fixed in commit 10a1cacb1. The importer will
zimoun writes:
> Ok, but for example this convention about CRAN is not consistent with
> the importer. :-)
> guix import cran corpcor -r
> fills the license field with (license gpl3+) and not (license license:gpl3+)
That’s right. The importer does not know where the generated package
Hi,
> Is the bioconductor importer usable from `guix import` ?
yes. You may encounter minor problems when using the recursive
bioconductor importer, as it may try to look up CRAN packages on
Bioconductor.
> This package is on Bioconductor:
>
Dear,
Thank you for your explanations.
And sorry if I am still slow to understand.
> > What is the convention about license ?
> > (license name) or (license license:name)
>
> Just about this point: This is not a "convention", this is part of the
> language definition of Guile, the underlying
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:31:44 -0500
zimoun wrote:
> What is the convention about license ?
> (license name) or (license license:name)
Just about this point: This is not a "convention", this is part of the
language definition of Guile, the underlying Scheme implementation:
In the module
Dear Ricardo,
Thank you for your explanations.
> > And I am asking myself if a massive import from Bioconductor should be
> > possible ?
>
> Certainly! I’ve done this before actually, but I hit two minor
> problems:
>
> 1. the bioconductor recursive importer does not *automatically* switch
>
zimoun writes:
> Thank you the explanations.
>
>
>> New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm. Eventually we
>> may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to
>> bioconductor.scm.
>
> I am a bit confused.
> The file bioconductor.scm contains (or will contain) all R
Thank you the explanations.
> New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm. Eventually we
> may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to
> bioconductor.scm.
I am a bit confused.
The file bioconductor.scm contains (or will contain) all R packages
from Bioconductor, right?
zimoun writes:
> I am not sure to understand what is the rule to attribute a package to
> bioinformatics.scm or to bioconductor.scm when it comes from
> Bioconductor.
bioinformatics.scm was there first. Later I added bioconductor.scm
because I didn’t want bioinformatics.scm to eventually be
Dear,
Thank you the nice importers.
I am not sure to understand what is the rule to attribute a package to
bioinformatics.scm or to bioconductor.scm when it comes from
Bioconductor.
For example, the package DeSeq2 from Bioconductor is in bioinformatics.scm.
To be concrete,
$ grep -e
10 matches
Mail list logo
