On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:42:22PM +, Leo Famulari wrote:
> lfam pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 1d51585573f49105edd1a577ba53e86367ffd821
> Author: Stefan Reichoer
> Date: Wed Sep 21 21:58:52 2016 +0200
>
> gnu: Add xonsh.
>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:01:30PM +0200, Stefan Reichör wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add xonsh.
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (xonsh): New variable.
I corrected the license to bsd-2 [0], moved the package definition to
(gnu packages shells) and pushed as 1d51585573f491.
Thanks!
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:59:08 -0400
> Leo Famulari wrote:
>
>> Should it block the package? Or perhaps we can push the patch as-is and
>> you can submit a follow-up to add the features you want?
>
> It's fine to use as-is, it just looks like a shell from 1973 :)
>
>
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:59:08 -0400
Leo Famulari wrote:
> Should it block the package? Or perhaps we can push the patch as-is and
> you can submit a follow-up to add the features you want?
It's fine to use as-is, it just looks like a shell from 1973 :)
LGTM.
Also, I've tested Stefan's package a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:18:28PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for this package! With the recent
> how-did-anyone-think-that-was-a-good-idea in bash (again), this is very
> useful.
>
> However, are you sure you want to have no inputs for xonsh?
>
> I can see that it supp
Hi,
thanks for this package! With the recent
how-did-anyone-think-that-was-a-good-idea in bash (again), this is very useful.
However, are you sure you want to have no inputs for xonsh?
I can see that it supports at least these:
- python-ply
- python-sphinx
- python-numpydoc
- python-prompt-tool
>From 966f98c8c83d69e71e6cf38c5521b6237990a81c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Reichoer
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:58:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add xonsh.
* gnu/packages/python.scm (xonsh): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 22 ++
1 file changed,
