Hi!
sorry for my late reply
I confess I haven't still read the whole Guix/GuixSD Reference Maulal,
so my apologies if I'm asking something already documented :-S
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
> We Guix developers don’t have control over the physical hardware behind
>
Ciao Giovanni,
Giovanni Biscuolo skribis:
> recently users and developers are facing hard to manage problems due to
> the maintainance of hydra.gnu.org and its proxy mirror.hydra.gnu.org [1]
> since 23 Oct 2018
We Guix developers don’t have control over the physical hardware behind
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:51:20PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> We could easily distribute nar files over distributed networks (IPFS,
> bittorrent, …) but we still need a "canonical source" that builds these
> packages, otherwise how do you know what you are looking for? Don't we always
>
We could easily distribute nar files over distributed networks (IPFS,
bittorrent, …) but we still need a "canonical source" that builds these
packages, otherwise how do you know what you are looking for? Don't we always
need some sort of central authority?
Le 2 novembre 2018 22:04:51
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 01:16:03PM +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> please is there a roadmap in GNU and/or Guix devel team to address this
> problems?
I think it would be a good idea to create a more distributed approach
for creating and finding substitutes. A simple name service would
help. We
Ciao,
recently users and developers are facing hard to manage problems due to
the maintainance of hydra.gnu.org and its proxy mirror.hydra.gnu.org [1]
since 23 Oct 2018
unfortunately many recent reports from users in help-guix and guix-devel
mailing list clearly shows that berlin.guixsd.org it's
