Thanks for the answer Cesar.
It's good follow the standards, but this can cause a bit of confusing
to the users.
2013/6/6 Jordi Torres jtorresfa...@gmail.com:
2013/6/6 Cèsar Ordiñana cordiny...@gvsig.com
Hi,
Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO
19107:2003 [1],
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG Version 2.0.0.2066
Java version: 1.6.0_20
**PROBLEM**
I have a MultiSurface3D ESRI shapefile.
I have tried but can't seem to convert it to something that gvSIG
Antonio Falciano wrote:
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG Version 2.0.0.2066
Java version: 1.6.0_20
**PROBLEM**
I have a MultiSurface3D ESRI shapefile.
I have tried but can't seem
Antonio,
I was unable to find this tool in the toolbox/sextante+gvSIG_geoprocesses!
So no, I have not used this function...
On 06/06/13 16:49, Antonio Falciano wrote:
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
Jukka,
To be honest nor have I.
This is what is reported in the gvSIG layer properties dialog.
On 06/06/13 17:02, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
Antonio Falciano wrote:
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG
El 06/06/13 10:44, Simon Cropper escribió:
Jukka,
To be honest nor have I.
This is what is reported in the gvSIG layer properties dialog.
Hi,
The MultiSurface3D type is the gvSIG geometry type name, not the Shape
type name, as it is independent of the data source type.
The relationship
Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we can try
to find what is happening?
I have I sent them to Joaquin del Cerro
On 06/06/13 19:43, Cèsar Ordiñana wrote:
El 06/06/13 10:44, Simon Cropper escribió:
Jukka,
To be honest nor have I.
This is what is reported in the
Hi Cesar,
There is any reason to choose that names, surface and so on, instead
the more common denominations?
2013/6/6 Simon Cropper simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com:
Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we can try
to find what is happening?
I have I sent them to
Hi Fran,
That names are based in the GML specification AFAIK.
Cheers.
2013/6/6 Francisco Puga fp...@cartolab.es
Hi Cesar,
There is any reason to choose that names, surface and so on, instead
the more common denominations?
2013/6/6 Simon Cropper simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com:
Hi,
Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO
19107:2003 [1], which specifies conceptual schemas for describing the
spatial characteristics of geographic features.
GML (ISO 19136:2007) [2] is a XML encoding compliant with the previous
ISO, so geometry types are
2013/6/6 Cèsar Ordiñana cordiny...@gvsig.com
Hi,
Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO
19107:2003 [1], which specifies conceptual schemas for describing the
spatial characteristics of geographic features.
GML (ISO 19136:2007) [2] is a XML encoding compliant
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG Version 2.0.0.2066
Java version: 1.6.0_20
**PROBLEM**
I have a MultiSurface3D ESRI shapefile.
I have tried but can't seem to convert it to something that gvSIG can
use properly.
The file contains 7 polygons but I
12 matches
Mail list logo
