It almost looks as if the ear was added later, as it is much more red than
her face.
Sharon C.
-Original Message-
From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Laning
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 6:19 PM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: Re:
Small note: the cone shape was area specific, not across Europe and the
British Isles. I understand your point though.
-Original Message-
Why wear tall cone shaped hats in the 1400's?
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
Who is the artist and period?
De
-Original Message-
I was particularly interested to find a painting of a veiled Virgin Mary
where her veil is transparent enough that you can see her ears:
http://paternosters.blogspot.com/2007/12/blessed-christmas.html
On 4/4/2012 1:18 AM, Sharon Collier wrote:
It almost looks as if the ear was added later, as it is much more red than
her face.
Well, it's covered with a veil, and the baby's ear is reddish too. But the
Virgin's looks practically separate from her head, a bit too far to the left.
I wonder if
On Apr 4, 2012, at 4:48 AM, Robin Netherton wrote:
On 4/4/2012 1:18 AM, Sharon Collier wrote:
It almost looks as if the ear was added later, as it is much more red than
her face.
Well, it's covered with a veil, and the baby's ear is reddish too. But the
Virgin's looks practically
