My husband sent this to me. Has anyone seen this before?
Thanks,
Catherine
Does anyone know where this picture comes from? A fellow on the Armour
Archive is wondering.
I find the idea of a clearly noble lady tending a forge more than a little
jarring . . .
Need the URL to the image. I have a suspicion, but would like to verify.
Mari
2008/6/18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My husband sent this to me. Has anyone seen this before?
Thanks,
Catherine
Does anyone know where this picture comes from? A fellow on the Armour
Archive is wondering.
I find
Sorry, I thought the image was imbeded in the e-mail. I'll try again.
Catherine
In a message dated 6/18/2008 9:34:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Need the URL to the image. I have a suspicion, but would like to verify.
Mari
2008/6/18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ah, it probably is, but my GMail is stripping the image out. Too bad. Mari
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I thought the image was imbeded in the e-mail. I'll try again.
Catherine
In a message dated 6/18/2008 9:34:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I thought the image was imbeded in the e-mail. I'll try again.
I don't think the list allows images or attachments. Can you send us a URL?
Like Mari, I have a suspicion. Several, in fact. There are some well-known
illuminations of women working a forge,
Jeb is trying to get the URL from the original poster. I'll forward it as
soon as he gets it. Other lists I'm on strip attachments, too.
The description you gave (sideless, bare head/long hair) matches the picture
he sent me. She is standing in front of the forge with tongs in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The description you gave (sideless, bare head/long hair) matches the picture
he sent me. She is standing in front of the forge with tongs in the fire.
Her gown and the skirt of the sideless are a rusty-red color, with the upper
part of the sideless in ermine.
I wrote:
The Book of Days cites it as Roman de la Rose, Paris, Bibliotheque
Sainte-Genevieve, MS 1125, fol. 115, but I believe that is wrong. The latter
image (same book, earlier manuscript) is most likely the one seen here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/medievalarchive/1862182937/
Typo,