Yep. :)
Thank you,
De
-Original Message-
Does this help?
--Robin
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
Quoting Robin Netherton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, otsisto wrote:
Someone told me that sideless surcoats were only worn by royalty, yet
I found a picture for a French manuscript by Guilaume de Machault that
shows a lady in waiting in what appears to be a brocade sidless. So
is
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Susan B. Farmer wrote:
Now, back to the image you asked about. The Machaut manuscripts include
several women in surcotes. They are all on the early end of this timeline,
around 1350, and are among the evidence for the surcote being worn by
French noblewomen in this
Quoting Robin Netherton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a digital copy of this image anywhere?
Hmm. I think there's one on the CD of the facsimile of Machaut's
manuscript, sold as a music reference -- an early music friend of mine
says that the CD includes the illuminations as well as the pages
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, otsisto wrote:
Someone told me that sideless surcoats were only worn by royalty, yet
I found a picture for a French manuscript by Guilaume de Machault that
shows a lady in waiting in what appears to be a brocade sidless. So
is the Royal only w/sideless a myth or
