Re: [h-cost] Sherlock

2010-10-23 Thread Patricia Dunham
not due to be on until Sunday night, the 24th, here in Oregon, the first one... 
Study in Pink.  It's been set up in the recorder for several days now!  We 
enjoyed the Downey/Law movie of last year, a lot; otherwise Jeremy Brett is our 
fav'  (right, except for the Private Life of SH movie, 1970, which is 
all-time favorite of my husband's)

chimene  

On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Lavolta Press wrote:

 Has anyone seen it, and how does it come across to fans of the original books 
 and the various movies set in the Victorian and Edwardian eras? I've only 
 seen a newspaper review.
 
 I've always thought that if Holmes were alive today, he'd be a computer geek, 
 probably developing viruses and cracking passwords just to see if he could, 
 but never releasing the viruses or using the hacked material for anything 
 evil. I think it was a neat touch that in the original version, Watson was a 
 veteran of an Afghanistan campaign--and in the updated version, he still is.
 
 On the other hand, I'm not sure I would like seeing a modernized version . . .
 
 Fran
 Lavolta Press
 Two new books of 1880s clothing patterns!
 www.lavoltapress.com
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Sherlock

2010-10-23 Thread Sam Coupland
The first episode is a little slow, but much of that is due to the introduction 
of the characters, the subsequent episodes are better, and the series has now 
been recomissoned..

I enjoyed it, but it seems a little odd with no nice outfits to look at.

sam


On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:09, Patricia Dunham wrote:

 not due to be on until Sunday night, the 24th, here in Oregon, the first 
 one... Study in Pink.  It's been set up in the recorder for several days 
 now!  We enjoyed the Downey/Law movie of last year, a lot; otherwise Jeremy 
 Brett is our fav'  (right, except for the Private Life of SH movie, 1970, 
 which is all-time favorite of my husband's)
 
 chimene  
 
 On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Lavolta Press wrote:
 
 Has anyone seen it, and how does it come across to fans of the original 
 books and the various movies set in the Victorian and Edwardian eras? I've 
 only seen a newspaper review.
 
 I've always thought that if Holmes were alive today, he'd be a computer 
 geek, probably developing viruses and cracking passwords just to see if he 
 could, but never releasing the viruses or using the hacked material for 
 anything evil. I think it was a neat touch that in the original version, 
 Watson was a veteran of an Afghanistan campaign--and in the updated version, 
 he still is.
 
 On the other hand, I'm not sure I would like seeing a modernized version . . 
 .
 
 Fran
 Lavolta Press
 Two new books of 1880s clothing patterns!
 www.lavoltapress.com
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 
 
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Sherlock

2010-10-23 Thread stilskin

 
 On the other hand, I'm not sure I would like seeing a modernized version
 . . .

Updated Holmes is one of the oldest tricks in the book...even Hollywood did it
with fanfare with the Rathbone series in the late-30s/early-40s.

I did not mind the pilot but thought it would make a good occasional bit of
viewing rather than a series given the zapping around the screen and the oddball
split-screening directors have fallen in lust with over the last decade -- stop
trying to find ways to excite us and just excite us. Still, the performances are
strong enough to let your memories of previous versions slip away for the 
duration.

Holmes as a sociopath worked well, Watson as an old warrior did so too. The
Moriarty hints were nice but Mycroft stuck out like dog's whatsits.

I never watched the second and third episodes due to work but probably would if
it did not mean doing anything more than flicking the TV switch. I guess that's
the whole review: good, watchable but you would not go out of your way for it,

-C.





This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Sherlock

2010-10-23 Thread Elena House
Okay, I was about to post a what on earth are you people talking
about post, but several minutes with google and my DVR answered that!
 For anyone else who didn't already know what they were talking about
but is interested, it's a BBC series that will air on PBS starting Oct
24 at  ...as Masterpiece Mystery, which explains why my DVR couldn't
find it as Sherlock.

-E House
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Sherlock

2010-10-23 Thread Kimiko Small
It depends on location as to when it aired/will air. I have to wait for 
Halloween night for the first episode! I've loved Sherlock since I was a kid 
reading all the stories, so I look forward to seeing how good or how bad this 
remake is.

 Kimiko Small
http://www.kimiko1.com
Be the change you want to see in the world. ~ Ghandi


The Tudor Lady's Wardrobe pattern
http://www.margospatterns.com/





From: Elena House exst...@gmail.com
but is interested, it's a BBC series that will air on PBS starting Oct
24 at  ...as Masterpiece Mystery, which explains why my DVR couldn't
find it as Sherlock.


  
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Sherlock

2010-10-23 Thread Lisa A Ashton
Hi, Lisa here, delurking.  Actually I thought the absolute BEST version
of Sherlock Holmes was the Russian Sherlock Holmes, a series filmed in
the late 70's and early 80's  in Russian with subtitles.  They got hte
dress right and the sets and scenes are amazing.   Of greatest
improtance, however, is that they actually got the STORIES right, unlike
the Jeremy Brett versions, which usually sacrificed the literary story,
as well as giving his HOlmes a rather malicious demeanor, I thought. 
Jeremy Brett is my LEAST favorite HOlmes ever.  I thought the Robert
Downey movie was ok, but really dragged on; however, visually, at least,
it was good.

Try googling Russian Sherlock HOlmes.  I don't know if there is way to
get them on DVD, I have recorded them off my TV where they are on Channel
451, MHZ International Mysteries.  on Sunday and Tues nights, along with
other international series.

Yours in cosutming, Lis aA

On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:09:19 -0700 Patricia Dunham
chim...@ravensgard.org writes:
 not due to be on until Sunday night, the 24th, here in Oregon, the 
 first one... Study in Pink.  It's been set up in the recorder for 
 several days now!  We enjoyed the Downey/Law movie of last year, a 
 lot; otherwise Jeremy Brett is our fav'  (right, except for the 
 Private Life of SH movie, 1970, which is all-time favorite of my 
 husband's)
 
 chimene  
 
 On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Lavolta Press wrote:
 
  Has anyone seen it, and how does it come across to fans of the 
 original books and the various movies set in the Victorian and 
 Edwardian eras? I've only seen a newspaper review.
  
  I've always thought that if Holmes were alive today, he'd be a 
 computer geek, probably developing viruses and cracking passwords 
 just to see if he could, but never releasing the viruses or using 
 the hacked material for anything evil. I think it was a neat touch 
 that in the original version, Watson was a veteran of an Afghanistan 
 campaign--and in the updated version, he still is.
  
  On the other hand, I'm not sure I would like seeing a modernized 
 version . . .
  
  Fran
  Lavolta Press
  Two new books of 1880s clothing patterns!
  www.lavoltapress.com
  ___
  h-costume mailing list
  h-costume@mail.indra.com
  http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 
 
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
 
 
 
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] h-costume Digest, Vol 9, Issue 297

2010-10-23 Thread Claire Clarke

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 20:49:49 +1100
From: stils...@netspace.net.au
To: Historical Costume h-cost...@indra.com
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Sherlock
Message-ID: 1287827389.4cc2afbd24...@webmail.netspace.net.au
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


 
 On the other hand, I'm not sure I would like seeing a modernized version
 . . .

Updated Holmes is one of the oldest tricks in the book...even Hollywood did
it
with fanfare with the Rathbone series in the late-30s/early-40s.

I did not mind the pilot but thought it would make a good occasional bit of
viewing rather than a series given the zapping around the screen and the
oddball
split-screening directors have fallen in lust with over the last decade --
stop
trying to find ways to excite us and just excite us. Still, the performances
are
strong enough to let your memories of previous versions slip away for the
duration.

Holmes as a sociopath worked well, Watson as an old warrior did so too. The
Moriarty hints were nice but Mycroft stuck out like dog's whatsits.

I never watched the second and third episodes due to work but probably would
if
it did not mean doing anything more than flicking the TV switch. I guess
that's
the whole review: good, watchable but you would not go out of your way for
it,

-C.

You can flick the TV switch tonight - it's been showing on free to air in
Australia with the third episode on tonight. Just not on the ABC, where
you'd imagine it would be. 

I liked the first episode a great deal. I was a bit distracted during the
second, but it struck me as less good.

Claire 

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume