Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-05 Thread Melanie Schuessler
On May 4, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Bella wrote: I think it's an optical illusion. What at first looked to me like an opening in the skirt, I now believe to be a blackworked handkercheif/small towel pinned to the waist. Yes, it's a muckinder. Melanie Schuessler

Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-05 Thread Suzi Clarke
At 03:17 05/05/2008, you wrote: On Sunday 04 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/KatherineGrey.jpg What in the world is going on with that child's skirt? Did the artist decide after the fact that the skirt should be split, with a forepart? Would trim

[h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-04 Thread 00217146
http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/KatherineGrey.jpg What in the world is going on with that child's skirt? Did the artist decide after the fact that the skirt should be split, with a forepart? Would trim really have been applied diagonally and interrupted? Emma

Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-04 Thread Margo Anderson
I find it hard to believe that they would have applied trim like that. My best guess is that the skirt is too big for the child and the front openings were folded back on themselves, but why they would do that for a formal portrait is beyond me. Who knows, there's probably some terribly

Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-04 Thread Susan Farmer
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/KatherineGrey.jpg What in the world is going on with that child's skirt? Did the artist decide after the fact that the skirt should be split, with a forepart? Would trim really have been applied diagonally and interrupted?

Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-04 Thread Bella
- Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/KatherineGrey.jpg What in the world is going on with that child's skirt? Did the artist decide after the fact that the skirt

Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-04 Thread Catherine Olanich Raymond
On Sunday 04 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/KatherineGrey.jpg What in the world is going on with that child's skirt? Did the artist decide after the fact that the skirt should be split, with a forepart? Would trim really have been applied diagonally

Re: [h-cost] What in the world? Odd 16th C. child's skirt

2008-05-04 Thread Margo Anderson
On May 4, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Bella wrote: I think it's an optical illusion. What at first looked to me like an opening in the skirt, I now believe to be a blackworked handkercheif/small towel pinned to the waist. D'oh! I see it now. :) Margo