I don't think there is much that you can do short of doing a SCRIPT and
RUNSCRIPT cycle.
You don't perhaps create temporary tables somewhere in your app?
That's the only thing I can think of that might lead to a situation with
that many sequences.
Doing a backup to script and then grepping
I'm using h2-1.3.168 in jboss 7.2.0.Final on a Win7.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups H2
Database group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
What exactly does the trace file say the problem is?
Also, this DB is working for me on the latest version.
Which may mean that the problem has been fixed, but might also just be
that something in your local environment, which is different to me, is
triggering the problem.
On 2013-09-30
Every insert gives this in bms.trace.db
org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: The database is read only; SQL statement:
insert into Element (lastSeen, sources, name, options, tupple, host_string,
assets2, DTYPE, string) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
'DeviceCapabilityService', ?) [90097-168]^M
at
Hi all,
My application is stalling when using MVCC. I'm using the 1.3.173 version
embedded in another application.
I was able to reproduce the exact same behaviour with 1.3.164 but analysing
the thread dump using that version it seemed to me that it was a deadlock.
With the most recent
MVCC has various issues. Some people use it successfully, for others it
doesn't work so well.
The basic advice, for now, is don't use it if it causes you problems.
We're not going to work on fixing any bugs in MVCC itself because Thomas
is working on a replacement engine which does MVCC
Hi
I'm sorry, at this I've reached the limit of my knowledge of that area
of the engine.
Hopefully Thomas will chime in.
Is it indeed a problem in database recovery.
I can tell is that it the DB is being set readonly by the following
logic in PageStore.recover()
if
Hi,
Thank you for the quick reply. Do you have a date for that release already?
Thanks,
Rui
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Noel Grandin noelgran...@gmail.com
wrote:
MVCC has various issues. Some people use it successfully, for others it
doesn't work so well.
The basic advice,
Thomas is working on it in his spare time, so pretty much sometime in
the next year or so
On 2013-09-30 13:56, Rui Vilão wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for the quick reply. Do you have a date for that release
already?
Thanks,
Rui
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Noel Grandin
Right thanks.
Rui
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Noel Grandin noelgran...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thomas is working on it in his spare time, so pretty much sometime in
the next year or so
On 2013-09-30 13:56, Rui Vilão wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for the quick reply. Do you have a date for that
Hi,
Ok sorry. I thought possibly it would be relatively easy to debug if you
could see it happening.
I can certainly create the test as a standalone stored procedure, and then
I suppose I should have a go at removing bits to try and reduce it.
In terms of h2 code is there a reason that the
On 2013-09-30 14:16, Mike Goodwin wrote:
In terms of h2 code is there a reason that the parameter references
need to be copied in the manner that they are? In my simplistic
understanding for a given stored procedure there will always be a
fixed number of parameters, so in an ideal world a
12 matches
Mail list logo
