[hackers] [st] [patch] use goto in xloadfonts

From a52cadacaa937d74ebc66016641d6cde8116eba6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Reed m.r...@mykolab.com Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:58:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] use goto in xloadfonts() --- st.c | 14 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/st.c b/st.c

Re: [hackers] [sbase][patch] find: empty line means no for -ok

Hi, Yes I most certainly did, this is what I get for submitting patches without testing. The shame. New patch attached, also protects against the glibc bug causing fgetc to hang after EOF was received. And what about if we send a patch to glibc instead? Regards,

Re: [hackers] Re: [slock] [PATCH] Slightly safer OOM killer disablement

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:42:15PM +1200, David Phillips wrote: Resubmitting after talking with the guys in IRC, and after noticing that whitespace got messed with in my original patch. -- Four word witty remark diff --git a/slock.c b/slock.c index d6053af..b3bee92 100644 --- a/slock.c

[hackers] Re: [slock] [PATCH] Slightly safer OOM killer disablement

Resubmitting after talking with the guys in IRC, and after noticing that whitespace got messed with in my original patch. -- Four word witty remark diff --git a/slock.c b/slock.c index d6053af..b3bee92 100644 --- a/slock.c +++ b/slock.c @@ -60,16 +60,27 @@ die(const char *errstr, ...) #ifdef

Re: [hackers] [9base][patch] cal: Bprint format specifier

Hi Evan, On 18 June 2015 at 20:01, Evan Gates evan.ga...@gmail.com wrote: Bprint didn't seem to like %u, giving the following output: [egates-vm 9base 686]$ cal/cal June % % S M Tu W Th F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29