Re: [hackers] Mailing list infiltrated?

Hi Google sent me an email that someone tried to log into my account. That was immediately after the signup to the mailing list. I got the welcome email from the mailing list at: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:56:31 -0800 (PST) At Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:56 PM (Eastern Standard Time) I got an email

Re: [hackers] Mailing list infiltrated?

On 11 December 2015 at 00:03, Harald Weber wrote: > I just subscribed to your mailing list and immediately got a warning > of some login tries from the US. Maybe there are some bots in your > mailing list? I don't understand. From whom did you receive such a mail? Can

Re: [hackers] Compiling stali

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Harald Weber wrote: > "/bin/sh: 1: gen/maketab: not found" What is this? Is this a missing input file, output file (missing directory in between) or something that can't be executed because its shebang can't be interpreted? cheers!

Re: [hackers] [sent] [PATCH 2/2] replace farbfeld with libnetpbm

Grant Mathews wrote: > Aside from those points: would rewriting the patch to not use libnetpbm, > but to use the Netpbm helpers instead, be acceptable? Heyho Grant, no it will not, but as noted in the other mail you are welcome to push your patch to the wiki. --Markus

Re: [hackers] Compiling stali

Hi Harald, On 11 December 2015 at 00:20, Harald Weber wrote: > Yes I think "conflicts: 43 shift/reduce, 85 reduce/reduce" results in > "/bin/sh: 1: gen/maketab: not found" Did you install flex and/or bison? -Anselm

Re: [hackers] Mailing list infiltrated?

On 11 December 2015 at 12:30, Harald Weber wrote: > Google sent me an email that someone tried to log into my account. > That was immediately after the signup to the mailing list. > > I got the welcome email from the mailing list at: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 > 14:56:31 -0800

Re: [hackers] Compiling stali

Yes I installed build-essential, flex and bison on the current debian live cd. flex 2.5.39 bison 3.0.2 On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Hi Harald, > > On 11 December 2015 at 00:20, Harald Weber wrote: >> Yes I think

Re: [hackers] [sent] [PATCH 2/2] replace farbfeld with libnetpbm

Heyho Grant, Grant Mathews wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:39:49PM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > > Netpbm is arguably almost more complex than BMP and not easy to handle. > > It's literally the top result when I search for the phrase "simplest image > format". So your world is limited by the first

Re: [hackers] Compiling stali

I can execute the provided executable of yacc in bin/hbase/yacc. If I change the config.mk to use the systems yacc i get the a similar message as warning. YACC = /usr/bin/yacc Errors: awkgram.y: warning: conflicts: 43 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] awkgram.y: warning: conflicts: 85

Re: [hackers] Compiling stali

On 12/11/15, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Harald Weber > wrote: >> "/bin/sh: 1: gen/maketab: not found" > > What is this? Is this a missing input file, output file (missing > directory in between) or something that can't be

Re: [hackers] [dmenu][RFC][PATCH] History functionality

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:31:09AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote: > >> I realized that I am not dealing with the case that the history file > >>

Re: [hackers] Compiling stali

Nothing to do with mount. I'm working on a custom mounted partition. root@ubuntu:~/stali/stalibuild# ls; pwd; mount | grep stali src toolchain /root/stali/stalibuild /dev/sda1 on /root/stali type ext4 (rw,relatime,data=ordered) On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Robert Ransom

Re: [hackers] [dmenu][RFC][PATCH] History functionality

Heyho On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Xarchus wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:31:09AM +0100, Silvan Jegen

Re: [hackers] [sent] [PATCH 2/2] replace farbfeld with libnetpbm

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:59:33 +0100 Markus Teich wrote: > Grant Mathews wrote: > > Aside from those points: would rewriting the patch to not use libnetpbm, > > but to use the Netpbm helpers instead, be acceptable? > > Heyho Grant, > > no it will not, but as noted