commit 6135cad495e562b0d3108942ca8de2b285699e0e
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 16 21:21:55 2015 +0100
Commit: sin
CommitDate: Wed Dec 16 20:25:50 2015 +
Move edit logic to an individual function
It is better to
commit 05af2156b6259ca8efc1674bc9d572a912bdba62
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 16 21:17:52 2015 +0100
Commit: sin
CommitDate: Wed Dec 16 20:25:50 2015 +
Fix small typo in comment
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index
commit 694a5ef7fbca54581a431a528972509c5a2e8bc0
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 16 20:18:09 2015 +0100
Commit: sin
CommitDate: Wed Dec 16 20:16:12 2015 +
call to addpre() in every iteration of subline()
It is
commit 3e130cee6698c3c3f95468a7b8a4e782ea474338
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 16 19:44:44 2015 +0100
Commit: sin
CommitDate: Wed Dec 16 20:16:12 2015 +
Escape correctly characters in getrhs()
getrhs() must remove
---
surf.1 | 7 +++
surf.c | 15 ++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/surf.1 b/surf.1
index c1d339a..1715f93 100644
--- a/surf.1
+++ b/surf.1
@@ -283,6 +283,13 @@ string
.TP
.B http_proxy
If this variable is set and not empty upon startup, surf
commit c5b36e17600920ac1a5d519620be5b38f8f9ed39
Author: Quentin Rameau
AuthorDate: Tue Dec 15 15:13:21 2015 +0100
Commit: sin
CommitDate: Wed Dec 16 09:52:35 2015 +
ed: fix cmd e/E
Ensure we have a filename before taking further action.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:54:28PM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> We checked the same condition in the "if" branch so it was never true
> in the "else if" one. Removing this condition makes the "else if"
> branch viable.
I'm sorry, but you are wrong here. Setjmp saves the current state
of the
commit d1bef890ea45a8aa492d0a1914c02110f982da28
Author: Quentin Rameau
AuthorDate: Tue Dec 15 15:45:16 2015 +0100
Commit: sin
CommitDate: Wed Dec 16 09:52:35 2015 +
ed: use arg.h
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index 032bc78..bde2c55 100644
--- a/ed.c
Heyho
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:54:28PM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> We checked the same condition in the "if" branch so it was never true
>> in the "else if" one. Removing this condition makes the "else