commit 7ad81d682ee7957bb87889e24138c37ed16db3d9
Author: Mattias Andrée
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 22 20:29:31 2016 +0200
Commit: Mattias Andrée
CommitDate: Wed Jun 22 20:29:31 2016 +0200
update todo
Signed-off-by: Mattias Andrée
commit c12bae156bbb7ea12f7b9370d5a3e661a2a35645
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 22 16:38:15 2016 +0200
Commit: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
CommitDate: Wed Jun 22 16:41:15 2016 +0200
[cc2] Update the value of sym->u.inst
commit 8945d761a051d5bc4fcfa9fe947a9fb74f9c9641
Author: Quentin Rameau
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 22 14:26:21 2016 +0200
Commit: Quentin Rameau
CommitDate: Wed Jun 22 14:27:17 2016 +0200
[cc1] simplify readline()
diff --git a/cc1/lex.c b/cc1/lex.c
commit 983e4cd19bb2cae781d84d6e75143f9a76935536
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 22 11:18:47 2016 +0200
Commit: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
CommitDate: Wed Jun 22 11:18:47 2016 +0200
[cc1] Do not allow comments between
Quoth Klemens Nanni:
> be thrown away as well, but how is turning this lengthy and empty-bodied
> for loop into a much clearer while loop *not* an improvement in readability?
I found that to be an improvement in readability too, fwiw.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:19:57AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
I don't think it is an improvement, so will disregard it.
Certainly not performance- or featurewise and the first patch may well
be thrown away as well, but how is turning this lengthy and empty-bodied
for loop into a much clearer
commit 60560f4989f5e451ab2d1ad96bc6ebcab6337017
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 22 09:07:00 2016 +0200
Commit: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
CommitDate: Wed Jun 22 09:07:00 2016 +0200
[cc1] Fix comments across several files