Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] fix segfault

2017-09-07 Thread Pieter Kockx
Hello Michael I agree, it also seems to be the style used elsewhere (and the reason elsewhere didn't segfault). Best regards Pieter On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 23:26 Laslo Hunhold wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:23:02 -0700 > Michael Forney wrote: > > Dear

[hackers] [sent] Correctly handle files that contain no slides || Laslo Hunhold

2017-09-07 Thread git
commit a5f760fa0ed3e6e8a04675d7cfa97cdb75791efd Author: Laslo Hunhold AuthorDate: Thu Sep 7 11:01:10 2017 +0200 Commit: Markus Teich CommitDate: Thu Sep 7 23:37:00 2017 +0200 Correctly handle files that contain no slides Otherwise, on

[hackers] [sent] update license || Markus Teich

2017-09-07 Thread git
commit 72d33d463fed7ba271961a6f91cae1fed8faa454 Author: Markus Teich AuthorDate: Thu Sep 7 23:40:26 2017 +0200 Commit: Markus Teich CommitDate: Thu Sep 7 23:40:26 2017 +0200 update license diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE index b3fab4d..e0be8ce

Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] fix segfault

2017-09-07 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:23:02 -0700 Michael Forney wrote: Dear Michael, > What do you think about just moving unescape to right after `adelim = > EARGF(usage());`? The default value does not need escaping. this would be a nice idea and would save us an allocation. With best

Re: [hackers] [sbase][PATCH] fix segfault

2017-09-07 Thread Michael Forney
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Pieter Kockx wrote: > Hello hackers > > Get a segfault by typing: > paste blabla Thanks for the report and patch. > It seems wise to scrutinize other calls to unescape() as well. It looks like other tools that call unescape only do so on

[hackers] [sbase][PATCH] fix segfault

2017-09-07 Thread Pieter Kockx
Hello hackers Get a segfault by typing: paste blabla It seems wise to scrutinize other calls to unescape() as well. -- Pieter From 45c61280dc1ef9e5692e2b570f6e191bfe4c9906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pieter Kockx Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:00:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] move config data to read-only sections

2017-09-07 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:04:47 + wrote: Dear Joachim, > > Well, C might not have the most beautiful syntax in this regard, > > but I see no other way to make a pointer itself read-only (and > > especially the ...cmd[] pointer arrays really should be). Would > >

Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] move config data to read-only sections

2017-09-07 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi Jo, On 6 September 2017 at 21:04, wrote: >> From: Anselm R Garbe [garb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 7:38 PM >> To: hackers mail list >> Subject: Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] move config data to read-only sections >> Are you suggesting to