On 2019-06-27, aidanwillie0317 wrote:
> Or, even simpler:
Thanks, this looks good. Only a couple minor comments.
Could you update the man page to reflect the fact that now only one
string is supported?
> ---
> yes.c | 10 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff
---
dwm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c
index 4465af1..60c2a24 100644
--- a/dwm.c
+++ b/dwm.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ buttonpress(XEvent *e)
arg.ui = 1 << i;
} else if (ev->x < x + blw)
click = ClkLtSymbol;
- else if (ev->x > selmon->ww -
> What about /dev/zero?
I really overengineered this benchmark, and I completely forgot about that.
> In fact, since yes(1) is a non-standard utility, I wonder if we should
> even bother supporting multiple arguments. It looks like some BSD
> implementations only repeat the first argument.
>
>
Hello,
> So, we could make this as simple as
>
> s = argc > 1 ? argv[1] : "y";
> for (;;)
> puts(s);
>
> >> I think I'd prefer
> >>
> >>for (;;)
> >>puts("y");
> >>
> >> here.
> > Originally, I had a puts(3) call there, but this decreased the
