On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 01:37:26PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> LDFLAGS="-s" is practically the same as calling strip and stripping it.
>
> It is up to the distro package/ports maintainer to strip symbols (or not).
> This can be an additional packaging step.
Since many of the Makefiles have
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 01:48:05PM +0200, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Hi Hiltjo,
>
> > I don't like this.
> >
> > I'd rather have it so the Makefile respects the system or package system
> > CFLAGS
> > and LDFLAGS by default. Then someone can do: make CFLAGS="-Os" LDFLAGS="-s"
> > etc.
> >
> >
Hi Hiltjo,
> I don't like this.
>
> I'd rather have it so the Makefile respects the system or package system
> CFLAGS
> and LDFLAGS by default. Then someone can do: make CFLAGS="-Os" LDFLAGS="-s"
> etc.
>
> LDFLAGS="-s" is practically the same as calling strip and stripping it.
>
> It is up
On Mon, 2 May 2022 13:37:26 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> I don't like this.
>
> I'd rather have it so the Makefile respects the system or package
> system CFLAGS and LDFLAGS by default. Then someone can do: make
> CFLAGS="-Os" LDFLAGS="-s" etc.
>
> LDFLAGS="-s" is practically
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 02:46:27PM +0600, NRK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Was wondering why most suckless program doesn't seem to strip the
> installed binary. strip (1p) is specified by POSIX so it should be
> portable.
>
> I noticed the binary size dropping a fair bit after stripping; the
> following
> Hi,
Hi NRK,
> Attached patches to strip the binary on installation for dwm, dmenu and
> st.
Looks good to me, thanks!
