Hi,
I know that there are some pending patches for sbase and ubase,
but I am a bit busy these days and I will not be able to look
a bit deeper on them until next week. Be patient until then :)
Thank you
I'm not sure why we're doing malloc() then memcpy() here, when
we could just make col->line.data point to start.data. This is costy
for huge sorts (3 time slower than other implementations with no real
reason). Since we are now working with the original line.data we need
to revert the s/\n/\0/
---
.gitignore | 1 +
Makefile | 1 +
README | 1 +
shuf.1 | 43 +
shuf.c | 110 +
5 files changed, 156 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 shuf.1
create mode 100644 shuf.c
diff --git a/.gitignore
The -m flag is not compliant to either the OpenBSD or the moreutils
implementation of ts(1), but closer to the toybox one. It allows
the user to add in nanoseconds, like toybox, but allows to specify
how many digits are printed.
---
.gitignore | 1 +
Makefile | 1 +
README | 1 +
ts.1
usage: strptime fmt timestamp
Most other userspace implementations allow in date(1) the parsing
of dates. That way, one can use a date string, and manipulate it
in scripts. However, the current date(1) implementation only accepts
Unix epochs to describe date and time. Rather than patching
---
.gitignore | 1 +
Makefile | 1 +
README | 1 +
libutil/getlines.c | 3 +-
tac.1 | 22 +++
tac.c | 68 ++
text.h | 3 +-
7 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 2
