Re: [hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] make OOM on new client non-fatal

2016-11-11 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Markus Teich wrote: >> >>> I can at least imagine cases where quitting on allocation failure is not >> >>> good. For example dwm is running, a new client starting up, but there is >> >>> no memory left for the client struct. In this case dwm should just print >>

[hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] make OOM on new client non-fatal

2016-11-11 Thread Markus Teich
--- > >>> I can at least imagine cases where quitting on allocation failure is not > >>> good. For example dwm is running, a new client starting up, but there is > >>> no memory left for the client struct. In this case dwm should just print > >>> an error, but not quit to give the user the chanc