On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:18:22 +0200
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Dear Mattias,
> Why wouldn't SIZE_MAX be the maximum of size_t?
you're totally right and I changed it. Thanks!
With best regards
Laslo
Why wouldn't SIZE_MAX be the maximum of size_t?
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 11:47:40 +0200
wrote:
> commit 25d89e6e460e68329e7a3f388fe3e150a8f5474a
> Author: Laslo Hunhold
> AuthorDate: Sun Jul 31 11:46:48 2022 +0200
> Commit: Laslo Hunhold
> CommitDate: Sun Jul 31 11:46:48 2022 +0200
>
>
commit 25d89e6e460e68329e7a3f388fe3e150a8f5474a
Author: Laslo Hunhold
AuthorDate: Sun Jul 31 11:46:48 2022 +0200
Commit: Laslo Hunhold
CommitDate: Sun Jul 31 11:46:48 2022 +0200
Use (size_t)(-1) instead of SIZE_MAX and fix style
SIZE_MAX cannot be relied upon to fully