On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:17:17 +0100
Giulio Picierro wrote:
Dear Giulio,
> sorry for the late reply, I had a really busy week (course to teach)
> :/.
don't worry about it! This is a mailing list and meant to be
asynchronous. Don't feel pressured to response and rather take your
time; it's a pasti
Dear Laslo,
sorry for the late reply, I had a really busy week (course to teach) :/.
I didn't have the chance to test the new code, which I will do soon,
hopefully.
If I understand correctly your solution is to read the rlimit from the
system and then update accordingly.
Now it seems to me
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:03:11 +0100
Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> that is a really nice observation! Thanks for pointing it out and your
> elaborate explanation. I must honestly admit that I assumed the limit
> was per process and not per user. I'll think about how to approach
> this the best way; given
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:29:53 +0100
Giulio Picierro wrote:
Dear Giulio,
> Quoting the book "The Linux Programming Interface" from Micheal
> Kerrisk: "the RLIMIT_NPROC limit, which places a limit on the number
> of processes that can be created, is measured against not just that
> process’s consum
Quoting the book "The Linux Programming Interface" from Micheal Kerrisk:
"the RLIMIT_NPROC limit, which places a limit on the number of processes that
can be created, is measured against not just that process’s consumption of the
corresponding resource, but also against the sum of resources consume
