Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 14 February 2016 at 02:00, wrote: > commit a6dc051e3744ce5b14c54d2d246d3e8258207e76 > Author: FRIGN > AuthorDate: Sun Feb 14 01:48:48 2016 +0100 > Commit: FRIGN > CommitDate: Sun Feb 14 02:00:14 2016 +0100 > > No need for usage()

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:51:00AM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:47:30 +0100 > Markus Teich wrote: > > Hey Markus, > > > then we would have to assume users don't have *any* binary starting with a > > `-` > > that they might want to run after locking,

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Markus Teich wrote: > Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:35:11AM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > > > My considerations here were that it was quite arbitrary not to document > > > -h, > > > given we "allow" a command to be passed to slock as

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread Markus Teich
Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:35:11AM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > > My considerations here were that it was quite arbitrary not to document -h, > > given we "allow" a command to be passed to slock as second + further > > arguments. However, I respect your stances on this and

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:35:11AM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:50 +0100 > Markus Teich wrote: > > Hey Markus, > > > I have to agree with Christoph here. People running off git can just use > > the rev > > id they are using. I don't get what you

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread FRIGN
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:50 +0100 Markus Teich wrote: Hey Markus, > I have to agree with Christoph here. People running off git can just use the > rev > id they are using. I don't get what you mean with the attack surface sentence. it was a rather weak argument by

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-15 Thread Markus Teich
Christoph Lohmann wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:46:52 +0100 g...@suckless.org wrote: > > 1) if you are running off git, -v will show the last stable > >release, effectively making this option useless. > >people running stable versions leave open an

Re: [hackers] [slock] No need for usage() || FRIGN

2016-02-14 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:46:52 +0100 g...@suckless.org wrote: > commit a6dc051e3744ce5b14c54d2d246d3e8258207e76 > Author: FRIGN > AuthorDate: Sun Feb 14 01:48:48 2016 +0100 > Commit: FRIGN > CommitDate: Sun Feb 14 02:00:14 2016 +0100 > > No