Re: [hackers] [scc] Revert "[driver] use pointers in tools lookup table" || Quentin Rameau

> if you look at the type-translation-tables, there > is kind of a "hack" to support the Plan 9 compiler > as well. The idiom of making a pointer struct-array > was circumvented to avoid doing that. I didn't understand what you meant by “make the changes in the arch-code-lookup-tables”, I thought

Re: [hackers] [scc] Revert "[driver] use pointers in tools lookup table" || Quentin Rameau

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:42:13 +0200 Qentin Rameau wrote: Hey Quentin, > Why would I have? > scc is the driver, it's not bound to cc1 or cc2. if you look at the type-translation-tables, there is kind of a "hack" to support the Plan 9 compiler as well. The idiom of making a

Re: [hackers] [scc] Revert "[driver] use pointers in tools lookup table" || Quentin Rameau

> Hey Quentin, hi > I was already wondering. If you had applied that change, you would've > also had to make the changes in the arch-code-lookup-tables. Why would I have? scc is the driver, it's not bound to cc1 or cc2.

Re: [hackers] [scc] Revert "[driver] use pointers in tools lookup table" || Quentin Rameau

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:22:13 +0200 (CEST) g...@suckless.org wrote: Hey Quentin, > Revert "[driver] use pointers in tools lookup table" > > This reverts commit 86e6d58d2e1059bb493df922bc89a1cc2b92ee83. > > This was a leftover from a test I forgot to drop before pushing. >