On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Markus Teich
wrote:
> Carlos Torres wrote:
>> Assuming this is for sent
>
> Heyho Carlos,
>
> Yes it was and it has already been applied a few hours later.
hah,
> since you can clearly see that from the mail which is sent by the git
Assuming this is for sent
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Ivan Tham wrote:
> ---
> config.def.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/config.def.h b/config.def.h
> index 9aa6e08..0a56047 100644
> --- a/config.def.h
> +++ b/config.def.h
Carlos Torres wrote:
> Assuming this is for sent
Heyho Carlos,
Yes it was and it has already been applied a few hours later. Patches sent on
the hackers list don't need an acknowledgement that they have been applied,
since you can clearly see that from the mail which is sent by the git hook.
commit 15240d34f2bc772e6232385437fa80dd424dac80
Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
AuthorDate: Wed Nov 25 22:33:08 2015 +0100
Commit: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
CommitDate: Wed Nov 25 22:33:08 2015 +0100
Fix static initializers
Static
> Mainly I want scroll when compiling. It print a lot of information and
> warnings. And I want to read them clearly without interrupting my
> compilation. Other than that I don't use scrolling much.
>
> ofcourse, i can redirect std err to a log file and see it. But when I run
> "make" I need to
I use st with the scrollback patch with mouse support. I hope that it
can be without shift but I doesn't know how to do it.
--
_
< Do what you like, like what you do. >
-
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\___
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:23 AM, David Phillips
wrote:
> Me, I use dvtm(1) instead of tmux, and I only have my dwm config set
> to run st with a dvtm session inside. This way, I can manually start
> st without dvtm by asking for `st` from dmenu or another terminal. I
>
On 11/24/15, g...@suckless.org wrote:
> commit 1aa2143073c30f374c33e0288135dc3e04494588
> Author: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> AuthorDate: Tue Nov 24 20:29:45 2015 +0100
> Commit: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> CommitDate: Tue Nov 24
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:03 AM, wrote:
> Remove CPPFLAGS from Makefiles
>
> CPPFLAGS is not POSIX, so it is better to define
> everything in CFLAGS and become more portable.
Glanced at the makefiles after the mention of POSIX here. Note the
.POSIX target is