Sorry for the spam. My sendmail wasn't set up correctly and went rogue
when it started to work.
On 8/17/20 10:58 PM, Armin Friedl wrote:
> Currently, maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
> default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
>
Currently, maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user.
To mitigate this, we respect system defaults and only raise the limit if it is
an actual raise.
---
main.c | 25
Currently, maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user.
To mitigate this, we respect system defaults and only raise the limit if it is
an actual raise.
---
main.c | 25
Currently maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user.
To mitigate this, we respect system defaults and only raise the limit if it is
an actual raise.
---
main.c | 25
Currently maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user which may easily have a couple hundred process
running before even starting quark.
To mitigate this, we respect
commit 3bd49b24561ce3c7be916ab0abbc78288721ddc4
Author: Laslo Hunhold
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 17 10:33:55 2020 +0200
Commit: Laslo Hunhold
CommitDate: Mon Aug 17 10:39:54 2020 +0200
Implement RFC 8615 (Well-Known URIs) and refine access errors
We generally rejected any URI that
commit 65600ffe7a2868e95cf172550c85aa074e209e0d
Author: Laslo Hunhold
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 17 11:37:25 2020 +0200
Commit: Laslo Hunhold
CommitDate: Mon Aug 17 11:37:25 2020 +0200
Reduce global state by localizing the server-struct
The server-struct variable s was global,
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 15:32:11 -0700
robert wrote:
Dear Robert,
thanks for your patch!
> Previously, all hidden targets were rejected with 403, but
> /.well-known/ and its contents should be an exception.
>
> - /* reject hidden target */
> - if (realtarget[0] == '.' || strstr(realtarget,
Then should the functions which use the global variable, "term", in st.c
accept a Term pointer instead?
In the case of st, I believe this may affect readability slightly,
however, it would allow for some extensibility(if dvtm, for example,
wanted to rewrite its terminal implementation).
I'm not
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 03:47:27 -0700
Jeremy wrote:
Dear Jeremy,
thanks for your feedback. In any case, before diving into this topic,
st's maintainer (Hiltjo) has the final say on these things. It's not a
clear-cut debate and depends largely on personal taste and practicality.
> Then should the
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:47:27AM -0700, Jeremy wrote:
> Then should the functions which use the global variable, "term", in st.c
> accept a Term pointer instead?
>
> In the case of st, I believe this may affect readability slightly,
> however, it would allow for some extensibility(if dvtm, for
11 matches
Mail list logo