Any chance of this set of patches being reviewed by someone with commit
privileges? Link to the thread for convenience since I'm cross-posting
to a different list: http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1504/26513.html .
Eric
I just found some programmers use one over another in every scenario, and I
could not see any reason for this bias. I just wanted to know if some advantage
existed. Sorry for the bad question.
--
Aditya Goturu
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling
down
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:06:04 +0530
Aditya Goturu aditya3...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any particular reason why I would use unix's fd and open()
instead of ANSI's FILE struct and fopen()?
Yes.
--
FRIGN d...@frign.de
FRIGN said:
Is there any particular reason why I would use unix's fd and open()
instead of ANSI's FILE struct and fopen()?
Yes.
This is the best answer I have ever seen on this list.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
commit c5f8294f632c909140732add5c7a2f4f40b8063c
Author: Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe first.lord.of.t...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Jun 11 13:58:13 2015 -0400
cksum: Skip files with read errors and continue
Previously, 'cksum *' exited early if * contained a directory or
other file causing
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:58:13PM -0400, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
Previously, 'cksum *' exited early if * contained a directory or
other file causing an fread() error.
Exit status is set to indicate an error has occurred.
Applied, thanks!
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:06:04AM +0530, Aditya Goturu wrote:
Is there any particular reason why I would use unix's fd and open()
instead of ANSI's FILE struct and fopen()?
This discussion belongs to dev@.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:42:32AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Hiltjo Posthuma hil...@codemadness.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Hiltjo Posthuma hil...@codemadness.org
wrote:
... snip ...
Some more thoughts: in drw.c these functions
