Re: [hackers] [sbase] [PATCH] install: ignore -s

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:44:38 +0100 Quentin Rameau wrote: > > diff --git a/xinstall.1 b/xinstall.1 > > index 1a727d3..bda4d42 100644 > > --- a/xinstall.1 > > +++ b/xinstall.1 > > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > > .Po > > .Fl d Ar dir ... > > | > > -.Op Fl sD > > +.Op Fl D > > .Po > > .Fl t Ar dest > > .A

Re: [hackers] [ubase] [PATCH] install: ignore -s

> diff --git a/xinstall.1 b/xinstall.1 > index 1a727d3..bda4d42 100644 > --- a/xinstall.1 > +++ b/xinstall.1 > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > .Po > .Fl d Ar dir ... > | > -.Op Fl sD > +.Op Fl D > .Po > .Fl t Ar dest > .Ar source ... > @@ -62,10 +62,6 @@ is copied with > Change the installed files' owne

[hackers] [ubase] [PATCH] install: ignore -s

The -s flag previously called strip(1) on the installed file. This patch changes install(1)'s behaviour to ignore -s. Many makefiles use the -s flag, so it has to be recognised for compatibility, however it does not have to do anything because symbols do not negatively affect the functionallity of

[hackers] Re: [sbase] [PATCH] install: ignore -s

Whoops, write [ubase] instead of [sbase] by mistake. On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 12:51:14 +0100 Mattias Andrée wrote: > The -s flag previously called strip(1) on the installed > file. This patch changes install(1)'s behaviour to ignore > -s. > > Many makefiles use the -s flag, so it has to be > recogni