On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 01:01:55PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> I am curious why ubase dd is using splice instead of just read/write
> (as you noted most other implementations do). Unless there is a big
> performance win, I would think that simplicity and portability would
> be preferable.
I
On 2017-09-17, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:31:24AM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
>> By setting the SIGINT handler with sigaction(2), automatic retries of
>> the splice(2) syscall can be disabled by not setting SA_RESTART. This
>> makes it possible to use
Aren't we depending on Xft already?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9838385/replace-of-xkeycodetokeysym#22418839
cheers!
mar77i
Hi Hiltjo,
I don't really like this change, see below for the reasons.
On 30 September 2017 at 12:39, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> --- a/dwm.c
> +++ b/dwm.c
> @@ -988,16 +988,18 @@ void
> keypress(XEvent *e)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> - KeySym keysym;
> +