On Sun Feb 25, 2024 at 8:13 AM CST, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Would you have a suggestion about how to handle cursor absolute
> position with text position, maybe we need some addition state?
I would suggest that cursor position control sequences should always operate on
a single-column basis. This
> Hi,
Hola k0ga,
> > st would always move back 1 column,
> > even with wide glyhps (using more than a single column).
> >
> > The glyph rune is set on its first column,
> > and the other ones are to 0,
> > so loop until we detect the start of the previous glyph.
>
>
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:57:03AM +0100, g...@suckless.org wrote:
> st would always move back 1 column,
> even with wide glyhps (using more than a single column).
>
> The glyph rune is set on its first column,
> and the other ones are to 0,
> so loop until we detect
commit 7473a8d1a57e5f9aba41b953f4e498c35e1c9dc5
Author: Quentin Rameau
AuthorDate: Sun Feb 25 01:31:31 2024 +0100
Commit: Hiltjo Posthuma
CommitDate: Sun Feb 25 11:56:43 2024 +0100
Fix cursor move with wide glyphs
st would always move back 1 column,
even with wide
