Sorry for the spam. My sendmail wasn't set up correctly and went rogue
when it started to work.
On 8/17/20 10:58 PM, Armin Friedl wrote:
> Currently, maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
> default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when s
Currently, maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user.
To mitigate this, we respect system defaults and only raise the limit if it is
an actual raise.
---
main.c | 25
Currently, maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user.
To mitigate this, we respect system defaults and only raise the limit if it is
an actual raise.
---
main.c | 25
Currently maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user.
To mitigate this, we respect system defaults and only raise the limit if it is
an actual raise.
---
main.c | 25
Currently maxnprocs may actually lower the limit. Especially when using the
default limit of 512, this quickly causes quark's fork() to fail when started
with a non-exclusive user which may easily have a couple hundred process
running before even starting quark.
To mitigate this, we respect
