Hi,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 23/12/24 11:46AM, Rene Kita wrote:
> > > + if (!from) {
> > > + len = 0;
> > > + t = NULL;
> > > + } else {
>
> This seems redundant. Normally, NULL shouldn't be passed, and even if it is,
> it
> is the
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:46:26AM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
> Nit as it's more a matter of style: I'd prefer to have one function to
> create a String and another function to create a String from a char
> array. This would make a cleaner interface and avoids passing and
> dealing with NULL all
On 23/12/24 11:46AM, Rene Kita wrote:
> > + if (!from) {
> > + len = 0;
> > + t = NULL;
> > + } else {
This seems redundant. Normally, NULL shouldn't be passed, and even if it is, it
is the responsibility of the "user-programmer" (think libc functions). This is
further
Comment inline.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:55:27PM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> This makes possible to use the function to initialize the string from
> an existing char array.
> ---
> ed.c | 30 +-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>
This makes possible to use the function to initialize the string from
an existing char array.
---
ed.c | 30 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index b430e74..13e956a 100644
--- a/ed.c
+++ b/ed.c
@@ -122,12 +122,24 @@
