Re: [hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] use correct conversion specifier for an unsigned integer

2023-01-16 Thread Tom Schwindl
> > I think %d is fine and correct here too. > > -- > Kind regards, > Hiltjo Indeed. I was wondering about this since it looks inconsistent to me. But to be fair, in reality this will probably never be problem. -- Best Regards, Tom Schwindl

Re: [hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] use correct conversion specifier for an unsigned integer

2023-01-15 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 11:08:39PM +, Tom Schwindl wrote: > --- > dwm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c > index 03baf42b3502..d832678ab5aa 100644 > --- a/dwm.c > +++ b/dwm.c > @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ monocle(Monitor *m) > if

[hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] use correct conversion specifier for an unsigned integer

2023-01-14 Thread Tom Schwindl
--- dwm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c index 03baf42b3502..d832678ab5aa 100644 --- a/dwm.c +++ b/dwm.c @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ monocle(Monitor *m) if (ISVISIBLE(c)) n++; if (n > 0) /* override