On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 01:01:55PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> I am curious why ubase dd is using splice instead of just read/write
> (as you noted most other implementations do). Unless there is a big
> performance win, I would think that simplicity and portability would
> be preferable.
I
On 2017-09-17, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:31:24AM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
>> By setting the SIGINT handler with sigaction(2), automatic retries of
>> the splice(2) syscall can be disabled by not setting SA_RESTART. This
>> makes it possible to use
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:31:24AM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> By setting the SIGINT handler with sigaction(2), automatic retries of
> the splice(2) syscall can be disabled by not setting SA_RESTART. This
> makes it possible to use Ctrl+C even if the "if" operand refers to the
> controlling